Back
SHIVAJI PANDEY
Harakhnandan Chaudhary – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
Shivaji Pandey, J. – Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
2. In this case, the petitioner is challenging the order contained in memo no. 2732 dated 25.09.2013, passed by the Collector-cum-District Magistrate, Nalanda, whereby and whereunder the petitioner has been dismissed from service. The same was challenged before the Divisional Commissioner, Patna, in Service Appeal No.142 of 2014, who vide order dated 26.04.2015, dismissed the appeal filed by the petitioner.
3. The petitioner was working as Halka Karamchari, while he was posted at Hilsa, a trap was conducted and he was caught red-handed of taking bribe, that led to institution of Vigilance P.S. Case No.53 of 2003 (Special Case No.13 of 2003) and later on, led to initiation of departmental proceeding and altogether five charges have been levelled against the petitioner and he was asked to appear in the departmental proceeding. The Additional Collector was appointed as the Inquiry Officer and accordingly, the departmental proceeding was started. The petitioner, at the initial stage, has taken plea for staying the proceeding on account of fact that identical matter is pending for trial in the
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
