SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Pat) 92

ASHUTOSH KUMAR, HARISH KUMAR
Abhilasha Sinha – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants : M/s Prince Kumar Mishra(in 301, 303, 305, 316, 354, 363, 448); Vishwajeet Kumar Mishra(in 306, 347); Abhanjali (A.C. To G.A. 2)(in 377, 381); P.K. Sahi, AG, Abhanjali (A.C. To G.A. 2)(in 384); Lalit Kishore, Sr. Adv., Sanjay Kumar Pandey, Nishant Kumar Jha (in 436).
For the Respondents: M/s P.K. Sahi, AG (in 301, 303, 305, 316, 354, 363, 448); Lalit Kishore (Ag)(in 306, 347); Amit Pandey (in 377, 381); Sanjay Kumar (in 384); P.K. Sahi, AG (in 436);
For the Resp. No. 12 : Mr. Manoj Kumar Singh (in 436).
For the BPSC : M/s Lalit Kishore, Sr. Adv., Sanjay Kumar Pandey, Nishant Kumar Jha (in 301, 303, 305, 316, 354, 363, 448, 384).
For Intervenor : M/s Sumit Kumar Jha, Adv., Riya Giri, Bivotosh Kumar(in 363).
For the U.O.I. : Mr. Awadhesh Kumar Pandey, Sr. CGC, Ravinder Kumar Sharma, CGC, Lokesh(in 384).
For the O.P. : Mr. Amit Pandey (in 436).

Ashutosh Kumar, J. – All the appeals raise a common question of law, based on same set of facts and therefore, they have been dealt with together and a common judgment is being pronounced.

2. We have heard Sri P.K. Sahi, learned Advocate General for the State in one of the appeals, Sri Lalit Kishore, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Sanjay Kumar Pandey, learned Advocate for the BPSC and Sri Vishwajeet Kumar Mishra and Sri Amit Pandey, learned Advocates for the respondents and Sri Sumit Kumar Jha for one of the proposed intervenors, who was permitted to raise the issues during the course of argument even though he had not formally been impleaded as an intervenor party. Sri Prince Kumar Mishra, learned Advocate has appeared for the successful candidates, whose appointment is under cloud because of the judgment under challenge; Sri Manoj Kumar Singh for the Rehabilitation Council of India and Sri Sunil Singh for the NCTE.

3. A batch of writ petitions was heard by the learned Single Judge, the lead case being CWJC No. 15081 of 2018, wherein an issue was raised on behalf of the applicants who had M.Ed. Special Degree, against the decision of not finding them to be having requisite

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top