Appellate Courts Can Rely on Unexhibited Public Documents Produced by Plaintiff: Gujarat High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Under Section 100 CPC
07 Mar 2026
Punjab & Haryana HC Denies Anticipatory Bail in Murder via Humiliation Case: Sections 103(1) & 3(5) BNS
07 Mar 2026
Security Deposit Forfeiture Without Show-Cause Notice Violates Natural Justice: Himachal Pradesh High Court
07 Mar 2026
S.202 CrPC Inquiry Not Mandatory for Public Servant Complaints If Accused Outside Jurisdiction: Supreme Court
09 Mar 2026
Professor MP Singh: Shaper of Constitutional Discourse
09 Mar 2026
Right to Promotion is Legitimate Expectation; Marriage-Based Transfer Can't Defeat It: Himachal Pradesh High Court
12 Mar 2026
Past Licenses and Undertaking Prove Knowledge of Copyright License Need, Warrant Ad-Interim Injunction: Bombay HC
13 Mar 2026
Non-Compliance on Counter Affidavits Draws Exemplary Costs Warning: Supreme Court in Gauri Maulekhi PIL
13 Mar 2026
SLPs Challenging PoP Idol Immersion Orders Disposed as Infructuous; Liberty to Assist Bombay HC: Supreme Court
13 Mar 2026
Back
Next 
PANKAJ MITHAL, REKHA BORANA
Usha Kumari D/o Gauri Sahay Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent
Headnote: Read headnote
JUDGMENT :
Rekha Borana, J.
1. The present are two sets of special appeals arising out two bunch of writ petitions. First set of writ petitions is of the petitioners whose writ petitions had been allowed at Principal Seat, Jodhpur, leading case being S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.17833/2018 (Rajni Vs. State of Rajasthan and Others) decided on 09.12.2019. Other set of writ petitions are those filed by the petitioners, which were dismissed by the Jaipur Bench of this Court, the lead case being S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.23192/2018 (Usha Kumari & Others Vs. State of Rajasthan & Others) decided on 20.01.2020.
2. The first set of special appeals (being SAW Nos.357/20, 477/20, & 98/21) have been preferred by the State against the order whereby the writ petitions of the petitioners therein had been allowed whereas the special appeals (SAW Nos.148/22, 149/22, 150/22 & 151/22) against the second set of writ petitions which were dismissed, have been preferred by the petitioners therein.
The NCTE is the only authority authorized to prescribe qualifications for teachers, and its prescribed qualifications must be followed by the State.
The court established that qualifications recognized by the RCI and NCTE must be honored in recruitment processes for special education teachers, as per the Supreme Court's directives.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
Listen Article