Chandra Mohan Choudhary vs State of Bihar

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(Pat) 109

ANSHUMAN
Chandra Mohan Choudhary – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Petitioners: M/s Ram Kishore Singh (in 826); Amit Kumar Singh (in 834).
For the Respondents: M/s Arvind Kumar, LO, Vigilance (in 826, 834).

Dr. Anshuman, J. – Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the Vigilance.

2. These Criminal Revisions have been filed for setting aside the order, dated 14.08.2014, passed by the Special Judge, Vigilance Trap, Patna, in Special Case No. 01 of 2006 arising out of Vigilance P.S. Case No. 5 of 2006.

3. The petitioners of both the criminal revisions are made accused in the said case. The petitioner of Criminal Revision No. 826 of 2014 (Shri Chandra Mohan Choudhary) was working as the Deputy Development Commissioner, Supaul, and petitioner of Criminal Revision No. 834 of 2014 (Shri Mundrika Choudhary) was working as the Director, District Rural Development Authority, Supaul, at the relevant time of lodging the first information report.

4. Counsel for the petitioners submits that as per the prosecution, the informant’s allegation was that the Office Clerk of the Deputy Development Commissioner, Supaul, was demanding Rs.1,000/- per house for allotment of work to his Panchayat for construction of houses under Indira Awas Yojna and according to him total 339 beneficiaries of Chhatarpur Panchayat were forwarded to the Deputy Development Commissioner, Supaul, fo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document