SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Pat) 116

ALOK KUMAR PANDEY
Deepak Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant : Mr. Bimlesh Kumar Pandey.
For the Respondent: Smt Abha Singh, A.P.P.

Alok Kumar Pandey, J. – The present appeal has been preferred against the judgment of conviction dated 07.02.2022 and order of sentence dated 08.02.2022 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, 7th cum Special Judge, Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (hereinafter referred to as POCSO), Bettiah, West Champaran in Ramnagar P.S. Case No. 121 of 2015, CIS No. 04/2018 whereby and whereunder the learned trial court has found the appellant guilty for the offences punishable under Sections 366A and 376 of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as IPC) and under Section 4 of POCSO Act and sentenced him to undergo ten years imprisonment for the offence punishable under Section 366A of the IPC, to undergo seven years rigorous imprisonment for the offence punishable under Section 376 of the IPC and to undergo ten years rigorous imprisonment along with fine of Rs. 20,000/- for the offence punishable under Section 4 of POCSO Act and in default of payment of fine he has to suffer two months additional imprisonment. All the sentences were ordered to run concurrently.

2. The name of informant and victim have been concealed in the present judgment to protect their prestige a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top