SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Pat) 203

ANSHUMAN
Mukesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioners: M/s Hansraj, Mayank Bilochan.
For the State : Mr. Bal Mukund Prasad Sinha, APP.
For the O.P. No.2 : M/s Krishna Ranjan, Rajnandan.

Dr. Anshuman, J. – Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State as well as learned counsel for the O.P. No.2.

2. The present Cr. Revision Application has been filed against the order dated 28.03.2018 passed by Additional District and Sessions Judge-I, Lakhisarai in Cr. Appeal No. 3 of 2013, by which, the order dated 26.02.2013 passed by Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lakhisarai in Misc. Case No. 11 of 2012 under Section 12 of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (43 of 2005) has been affirmed by which petitioner was directed to pay Rs.15 lacs to the opposite party No.2 within a period of two months and also Rs.5 lacs as compensation and further Rs.25,000/- per month as maintenance and same shall be paid in the first week of every month.

3. Learned counsel for the opposite party No.2 submits that the order passed by Chief Judicial Magistrate has been passed after issuance and service of summons. Learned counsel submits that from the order dated 26.02.2023, it transpires that under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 notices were issued upon the petitioner who has not appeared, thereafter, general notice was published in Dai

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top