SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Pat) 224

SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA
Md. Gayasuddin – Appellant
Versus
Most. Girija Devi – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioners: Mr. Arbind Kumar Singh.
For the Respondents: Mr. Ajit Kumar Singh.

Sunil Dutta Mishra, J. – Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. This Civil Miscellaneous Application has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order dated 13.09.2018, passed by learned Sub-Judge-I, Purnea in Title Suit No. 165 of 2014 whereby and whereunder the learned court below rejected the petition dated 20.02.2016 filed by the petitioners for accepting the written statement filed by them after recalling the order dated 18.09.2015 by which petitioners have been debarred from filing written statement.

3. It appears from the record that the plaintiffs/ respondent 1st party filed Title Suit No. 165 of 2014 for declaration that the plaintiffs are Kaimi Raiyat of the ancestor suit holdings. The petitioners/ defendants appeared in the suit on 17.04.2015 but written statement on their behalf has not been filed within the prescribed time period accordingly the learned court below debarred the defendants from filing written statement on 18.09.2015. The application for recall of the said order and accepting the written statement filed on their behalf has been rejected by the learned trial court.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitione

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top