SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Pat) 263

RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD
Suresh Prasad – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Akhilesh Dutta Verma, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. Uday Shankar Saran Singh (GP-19), for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

1. This application was initially filed for the following reliefs:

"(i) For issuance of an order, direction or writ including writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to make payment of entire salary with consequential benefits from 01.10.2008.

(ii) For issuance of an order, direction including writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to make payment of monthly pension regularly month to month on the 1st of every month,

(iii) For issuance of an order, direction or writ including writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to payment of gratuity with interest from the date it was due i.e. 31.08.2016 till the date of payment is made.

(iv) For issuance of an order, direction or writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to make payment of leave encashment with interest at the market rate from the date it was due till the date payment would be made.

(v) For issuance of an order, direction or writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to make payment of provident fund with interest at the market rate from the date it was due till the date payment would be made.

(vi) For issuance of an order, direction or wr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top