ANSHUMAN
Liyakat Ali Son of Late Munshi Khan – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defect(s) within two weeks.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, counsel for the State and the counsel for the Central Bureau of Investigation.
3. Counsel for the petitioner submits that he has filed the present writ petition for setting the order, dated 20.02.2020, by which the Special Court, CBI, Patna, has rejected the application of the petitioner, dated 31.01.2020, wherein the petitioner has made request to the Special Court to direct the District Cooperative Officer, Buxar, to produce the relevant documents which is in the interest of justice. Counsel for the petitioner submits that Annexure 3, i.e., a letter dated 12.03.2010 was provided to the petitioner by virtue of compliance of Section 207 of the Criminal Procedure Code. At that very time counsel for the petitioner has filed a petition, dated 08.10.2012, by which the most relevant documents on the basis of which letter, dated 12.03.2010, has been prepared was demanded from the prosecution and in response of the said petition the Court has rejected the prayer of the petitioner and observed that the accused can not invoke Section 91 of the Criminal Proced
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.