IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
PARTHA SARTHY, J.
Basudev Saw, son of Late Ram Kisun Saw and Ors. - Petitioners
Versus
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms and Ors. - Respondents
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9536 Of 2022
Decided On : 29-03-2023
Jurisdiction - Land Dispute - Bihar Land Disputes Resolution Act, 2009 - Section 4(c), Section 4(h) - The Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950, The Bihar Tenancy Act, 1885, The Bihar Privileged Persons Homestead Tenancy Act, 1947, The Bihar Bhoodan Yagna Act, 1954, The Bihar Land Reforms (Fixation of Ceiling and Acquisition of Surplus Land) Act, 1961, The Bihar Consolidation of Holdings and Prevention of Fragmentation Act, 1956
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners sought to quash an order passed by the Deputy Collector Land Reforms, Dehri, Rohtas in a land dispute resolution case. The respondent no.5 had filed an application for demarcation of purchased land, claiming a boundary dispute under section 4(h) of the Bihar Land Disputes Resolution Act, 2009. The petitioners had also filed an application for demarcation under the same Act.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the respondent no.5's application was not maintainable under the Act as he was neither an allottee nor a settlee as defined under the Act. The court held that the purpose of the Act was to resolve disputes arising under specific Acts mentioned in Schedule-1, and as the respondent no.5's case did not fall under any of those Acts, his application was not maintainable.
Issues: The main issue was whether the respondent no.5's application for demarcation of purchased land was maintainable under the Bihar Land Disputes Resolution Act, 2009.
Ratio Decidendi: The court interpreted the provisions of the Act, specifically section 4(c) and section 4(h), and analyzed the definition of 'allottee or settlee' under the Act. The court also considered the preamble of the Act to ascertain the legislative intent.
Final Decision: The court quashed the order passed in the land dispute resolution case, holding that the respondent no.5's application was not maintainable under the Act. The writ application was allowed in favor of the petitioners.
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the respondent-State and learned counsel for the respondent no.5.
2. The petitioners have filed the instant application for the following relief(s):
3. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the petitioners that the instant application arises out of an order dated 20.5.2022 passed in Resolution Case no.17/2021-22 by the Deputy Collector Land Reforms, Dehri, Rohtas.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the order impugned dated 20.5.2022 was passed by the D.C.L.R., Dehri, Rohtas on an application filed by the respondent no.5 under section 4(c) of the Bihar Land Disputes Resolution Act, 2009 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’). It is submitted that the respondent no.5 neither being an allottee nor a settlee as defined under section 2(f) of the Act, the application under section 4(c) of the Act itself was not maintainable and consequently the order impugned dated 20.5.2022 (Annexure-2) is without jurisdiction. Thus, the same be set aside and the writ application be allowed.
5. Learned counsel appearing for respondent no.5 submitted that from perusal of the application filed by the respondent no.5, copy of which has been brought on record as annexures to the writ application, it would transpire that the same is not under section 4(c) of the Act and mentioning the application of respondent no.5 as being under section 4(c) of the Act in the order impugned dated 20.5.2022, the D.C.L.R., Dehri, Rohtas has committed an error of record. It is submitted that as stated in his petition before the D.C.L.R., Dehri, Rohtas, the respondent no.5 purchased the land in question by a registered sale deed dated 27.9.2019 and had filed the application before the D.C.L.R., Dehri, Rohtas praying for demarcation of his purchased land. Thus, in effect, the application of the respondent no.5 was with respect to boundary dispute which comes under section 4(h) of the Act.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and having gone through the affidavits on record, it transpires that the petitioners purchased the land in question by a registered sale deed dated 3548 dated 27.9.2019 and thereafter a jamabandi was opened in his name. It is for this land that the petitioners filed the application before the D.C.L.R., Dehri, Rohtas which was registered as Land Dispute Case no.17/2021-22 praying therein for demarcation.
7. From the materials on record, what is not in dispute is that the application filed by the petitioners as contained in Annexure-1 to the writ application before the D.C.L.R., Dehri, Rohtas was under the Bihar Land Disputes Resolution Act, 2009.
8. Section 4 of the Act talks about the jurisdiction and author
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the Bihar Land Disputes Resolution Act, 2009 is intended to resolve disputes arising under specific Acts mentioned in Schedule-1, and applicat....
The judgment emphasizes the importance of continuous rent receipts and evidence of possession in validating land settlements under the Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950. It also highlights the significanc....
The competent authority under the Bihar Land Disputes Resolution Act, 2009 must resolve unauthorized dispossession disputes.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the settlement made in favor of the vendors of the writ petitioners had already attained finality by the order of the Patna High Court, and th....
An order made without jurisdiction is void and cannot be sustained; ownership rights established must be recognized despite conflicting authority actions.
The authority under the Bihar Land Disputes Resolution Act must expeditiously resolve disputes of unlawful dispossession.
Authority cannot cancel confirmed leases under a different statute, maintaining jurisdiction of High Court to intervene when lower authority exceeds legal bounds.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.