Back
ILESH J. VORA, VIMAL K. VYAS
Yunus Satarsha Shahmadar Fakir Karia – Appellant
Versus
State Of Gujarat – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(ILESH J. VORA, J.) :
1. This conviction appeal has been preferred at the instance of appellant convict.
2. The present appeal under Section 374 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Old) is against judgment of conviction and order of sentence passed by the Sessions Court, Gondal, Rajkot in Sessions Case No.18 of 2012, wherein, the appellant came to be tried for offences punishable under Sections 363, 366, 376 and 506(2) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Old). At the end of the trial, the appellant came to be convicted for offences punishable under Sections 363, 366, 376, 506(2) of the IPC (old) and sentenced as under:
| Sections | Punishment |
| S. 376 of the IPC | Imprisonment for life and fine of Rs. 25,000/-, in default SI for three months. |
| S. 363 of the IPC | RI for three years and fine of Rs. 1,000/-, in default SI for one month. |
| S. 366 of the IPC | RI for three years and fine of Rs. 1,000/-, in default SI for one month. |
| S. 506(2) of the IPC | RI for one month and fine of Rs. 100/-, in default SI for three days. |
The judgment was rendered on 14.03.2013 and all sentences were ordered to run concurrently.
3. We have heard
The testimony of a victim in sexual assault cases can be sufficient for conviction if corroborated by credible evidence, including medical reports.
The determination of the victim's age is crucial in cases of sexual offences, and the court emphasized the importance of following the procedure for determining the age of a juvenile under the Juveni....
The conviction for rape can be overturned if the evidence is insufficient to demonstrate the lack of consent, particularly when the victim's own statements indicate a consensual relationship.
The prosecution must prove a victim's age beyond reasonable doubt, and consent negates charges of kidnapping and rape when the victim willingly engages in a relationship.
The court established that a victim's age and the nature of consent are critical in determining liability for sexual offenses, emphasizing the importance of conclusive evidence.
The importance of proving the victim's age and the need for corroboration of the victim's testimony in cases of sexual offences.
The court emphasized the necessity for the prosecution to prove the victim's age and elements of force beyond reasonable doubt in cases involving sexual offenses against minors.
Prosecution must prove charges beyond reasonable doubt; victim's testimony must inspire confidence. Critical inconsistencies undermined the conviction for kidnapping and rape.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
