Back
ANSHUMAN
Neeraj Kumar, S/o. Sri Ramvilash Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State Mr. Nand Kumar and learned counsel for the Opposite Party Mr. Rai Mukesh Sharma.
2. The present criminal revision application has been filed against the order dated 08.06.2016 passed by Mr. A.N. Jha, Principal Judge, Family Court, Begusarai in Maintenance Case No. 94M/2011 by which Principal Judge has directed the petitioner to pay a sum of Rs.4000/-per month for maintenance to the O.P. No.2 and Rs.1000/-per month for each of the minor child i.e. Rs.2000/-, the whole amount of Rs.6000/- has been directed to pay to the petitioner from the date of order i.e. w.e.f. 08.06.2016.
3. In the said order it has also been mentioned that the payment of maintenance be made on 10th of every month and the order of payment shall remain operative till the life time of O.P. No.2 or till re-marriage whichever is earlier and in case of children the payment shall operate till they attain majority. Payment of litigation cost is directed to be made within two months from the date of this order.
4. Counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the present case in which he has moved before this Court is Criminal Revision un
Failure to raise questions of correctness, legality, or propriety in a maintenance order is essential for the applicability of Section 19(4) of the Family Court Act, 1984.
The court upheld the maintenance order based on the financial circumstances of the parties and the provisions of section 125 of the Cr.P.C. to prevent destitution.
three children are under the custody of their mother/ petitioner. Since the petitioner is a guardian of their children she has to maintain the education and marriage of the children etc. Further, the....
The court upheld a maintenance order, affirming that maintenance under S. 125 CrPC is intended to prevent vagrancy, and quantum is determined by reasonable living costs and the status of parties, pro....
Maintenance awarded by the Family Court must not exceed one-third of the paying spouse's income, considering their financial capacity and the needs of the dependents.
A father is liable to pay maintenance to his minor child, even if the child is in the custody of the mother, if he has neglected to maintain the child and has the means to do so.
: FIXATION OF MONTHLY MAINTENANCE - First respondent as well as the revision petitioner are financially sound- Educational expenses of the respondents 2 and 3, status of the parties and the present e....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
