SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Pat) 300

PARTHA SARTHY
Arun Kumar Goenka – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner: M/s Jitendra Kishore Verma, Sumeet Kumar Singh.
For the Respondents: M/s Rishi Raj Sinha, SC-19, Manish Dhari Singh.
.

Partha Sarthy, J.—Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The instant application has been filed for the following relief(s):—

“1. That the present writ application is being filed in the nature of Certiorari for setting aside the notice bearing memo no. 1359 dated 05.07.2019 issued under Section 4(h) under the Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950 bearing case no. 01/2019 with regard to the property situated in Mauja Salaiya, Thana No. 89 Khata No. 52, Plot No. 1156, area 61.85 acre, Khata No. 53, Plot No. 1155, area 100.60 acre, Mauja Suarkol, Thana 88, Khata No. 76, Plot No. 804, area 31.50 acre marked as Gairmajarua (Annexure-P/11); on the ground that the said notice is without making the appropriate enquiry pertaining to the land before claiming to be a public land, without clarifying the actual state of affair, without verifying the nature of the land in question etc., without issuance of public notice, without issuance of notice under Rule-4 Form B-1 of the Bihar Land Reforms Rule, 1951 which itself vitiates the entire proceeding;

For any other relief/ reliefs for which the petitioner is entitled for;”

3. The case of the petitioners in brief is that Arun Kumar Goenka (petitioner no.1) a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top