SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Pat) 754

ANSHUMAN
Bhagwan Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioners: M/s Gopal Govind Mishra, Ashutosh Kumar.
For the Respondents: Mr. Md. Khurshid Alam, (AAG-12).

Dr. Anshuman, J. – Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the land of the petitioners have been acquired under the provisions of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, [Act No. 30 of 2013] (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act of 2013).

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the process of acquisition of the land was made for the construction of Sub-Divisional Civil Court, Jagdishpur and the residential quarter for Judicial Officers at Jagdishpur in Bhojpur District in the year, 2021.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the notification under Section 11(1) of the Act of 2013 has been made in the newspaper dated 03.06.2021. The notification under Section 18 of the Act of 2013 was made on 23.09.2021 and notification under Section 19(1) of the Act of 2013 has been made on 01.10.2021.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioners further submit that within 15 days from the initial notification on 03.06.2021, the petitioners have filed their objections on 09.06.2021 as per Section 15 of the Act of 2013.

6. Learned

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top