Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
BIBEK CHAUDHURI
Manif Mian, Son of Noor Mohammad Mian – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar, through the Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Revenue and land Reform, Government of Bihar, Patna – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's request for fair compensation. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. procedure for objection to land acquisition awards. (Para 3) |
| 3. referral to authority for assessment and compensation. (Para 4) |
| 4. disposal of writ petition directing reference. (Para 5) |
| 5. court's directive on delay condonation and dismissal. (Para 6 , 7) |
JUDGMENT :
BIBEK CHAUDHURI, J.
The petitioner has filed the instant writ petition for the following relief(s) :
I.) To issue a writ/Writs, Order/Orders, Direction/Directions to the respondent authorities to set aside the award (Annexure-2) prepared by the respondent no. 6, because the same is contrary to the Right to fair compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act 2013( Act no. 30/2013)
II.) To issue a writ/Writs, Order/Orders, Direction/Directions to the respondent authorities to prepare fresh award as per the Right to fair compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act 2013(Act no. 30/2013)
III.) To issue a writ/Writs, Order/Orders, Direction/Directions to the respondent authorities to consider the market value of the land as well as price fixed by the government for the land o
Proper compensation assessment procedures under Section 64 of the 2013 Act must be followed, allowing the authority to consider referral and potential delays for justifiable reasons.
The court affirmed that disputes regarding compensation inadequacy must be referred to the appropriate authority under the Act, underscoring the Collector's duty to comply with statutory timelines.
Timely processing of compensation applications under land acquisition laws is essential for fulfilling the rights of property owners.
The existence of alternative remedies under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Act precludes the exercise of extraordinary jurisdiction by the High Court.
The court ruled that once acquisition proceedings are initiated, petitions seeking mandamus for compensation assessment are rendered moot.
The authority must consider land classification objections in compensation determinations, irrespective of timing, ensuring compliance with statutory obligations.
Court emphasized the necessity for proper assessment under the Land Acquisition Act based on current market value.
Determination of amount of compensation – Reference to appropriate authority – Collector has no jurisdiction to go into such question.
Acquisition of land – Where no award under Section 11 of Act of 1894 has been made, then, all provisions of new Act of 2013 relating to determination of compensation would apply.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
