P. B. Bajanthri, J. – It has been pointed out that in the order dated 18.09.2023, inadvertently it has been mentioned as order no. 4 in place of order no. 24. Similarly, in the order dated 19.09.2023 also, it has been mentioned as order no. 5 in place of order no. 25.

2. Let ‘the order no. 4 dated 18.09.2023’ and ‘order no. 5 dated 19.09.2023’ be read as ‘order no. 24 dated 18.09.2023’ and ‘order no. 25 dated 19.09.2023’.

3. Accordingly, both the aforesaid orders are modified to the aforesaid extent only.

4. With the consent of the learned counsels for the parties matter is taken up for final disposal.

5. In the instant petition, petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s): –

“(i) Quashing the order dated 05.05.2022 (Annexure- 9), as contained in letter no. 2319, passed by the respondent no. 3, namely the Deputy Commissioner of Excise (Distilleries & Warehouses), Bihar, Patna on the direction of the respondent no. 2, namely the Excise Commissioner, Bihar, by which, in gross violation of the interim order dated 12.11.2020, passed in CWJC No. 7463 of 2020 (Molson Coors Cobra India Pvt Ltd vs. The State of Bihar) and other analogous cases, directing that no coercive action be precip