Satyavrat Verma, J. – Heard Ms. Sushmita Sharma learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. I.A. No. 01 of 2023 has been filed for deletion of the name of petitioner no. 1 from the array of party in Cr. Misc. No. 67708 of 2019 as the petitioner no. 1, during pendency of this application, left for his heavenly abode.

3. The name of the petitioner no. 1 is deleted from the array of party in Cr. Misc. No. 67708 of 2019.

4. Accordingly, I.A. No. 01 of 2023 stands allowed.

5. The present application has been filed for quashing of the order dated 01.04.2017 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-V-cum-Special Judge, Gaya in Sessions Trial No. 01 of 2017 arising out of Rampur P.S. Case No. 131 of 2016 whereby charges have been framed against the petitioner under Sections 47(a), 48, 53(c), 54 and 63 of the Bihar Excise Act, 1915 as amended by the Bihar Excise (Amendment) Act, 2016.

6. Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset, submits that she is aware of her limitation in arguing this matter. It is further submitted that though charges have been framed, trial has commenced and is on the verge of conclusion but still this Court can interfere in the