IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
SAMIT GOPAL, J.
Kunal Chawala – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. and another – Respondents
Application U/S 482 No. 11542 of 2023
Decided on : 24-05-2023
Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 420, 120-B - Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 482, 173(2), - Uttar Pradesh Excise Act, 1910 - Section 60, 63, 63 - Quashing of criminal proceeding - Quashing of First Information Report - Punishment of criminal conspiracy - Cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property - Held, It is case of applicant that godown is of company, same is to be taken up in trial at appropriate stage to show as to who is owner of godown and whose material is being stocked therein - Proceedings on said ground itself cannot be quashed - Proposition of law with regards to maintainability of a petition under section 482 Cr.P.C. even at stage of recording of evidence in trial is not in dispute at all but decision of same would be in facts and circumstances of each and every case independently - Dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
1. List revised.
2. Heard Sri Gopal S. Chaturvedi, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Dileep Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Shashi Kant Pandey, learned brief holder for the State of U.P. and perused the records.
3. The present Criminal Misc. Application U/S 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicant Kunal Chawala with the following prayers:
It is further prayed that this Hon’ble Court may graciously be pleased to stay the further proceeding of Case No. 11020 of 2022 (State Vs. Raman Jaiswal and others), under Sections 420, 120-B IPC and Section 60, 63, 72 of U.P. Excise Act, arising out of Case Crime No. 666 of 2021, Police Station-Madhuban Bapudham, District Ghaziabad, pending before the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ghaziabad, during the pendency of the present case, otherwise the applicant shall suffer irreparable loss and injury, and/or may pass such other and further order which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case.”
4. The prosecution case as per the First Information Report lodged on 30.12.2021 by Smt. Sheelabh Mishra the Excise Inspector, Sector-3, Ghaziabad, the opposite party no.2 under Sections 420, 120-B IPC and Section 60, 63, 72 of U.P. Excise Act, 1910, Police Station-Madhuban Bapudham, District Ghaziabad against the applicant Kunal Chawala, Raman Jaiswal, Ramveer Singh, Sunil Kumar, Lalji Yadav and Vipin Yadav on the basis of a recovery memo of recovery of 4809 cartons and 266 loose bottles of Indian Made Foreign Liquor, arrest of four accused persons and recovery of four vehicles being Truck No. HR 55 X 0004, Truck No. HR 68 C 5032, Ford Ecosport DL 5 CR 468 and Hyundai i-20 UP 16 Z 0006 alleging therein that FIR No. 385 of 2021 was lodged in District Moradabad in which Nagendra Yadav resident of Meerut was apprehended transporting 40 bottles of Indian Made Foreign Liquor. He disclosed that the liquor was brought from the custom godown of Kunal Chawla from Ghaziabad and he supplies it illegally in various Districts in Uttar Pradesh. For the supply, Vipin Yadav who is the person of Kunal Chawla and having mobile No. 8800482499 helps him and by calling on the said number liquor can be called anywhere. On the said information, the District Excise Officer, Ghaziabad under supervision of the first informant along with Excise Inspectors and Enforcement Officers of Excise Department of Meerut formed a team. On the basis of information received from Moradabad on 29.12.2021, the said Officers reached the godown of Kunal Chawla in P.S. Madhuban. The main gate of the godown was open and two trucks were standing inside from which cartons of liquor was being kept inside. Two persons met inside. On asking, they disclosed their names as Raman Jaiswal and Ramveer Singh. On further asking, they disclosed that they were in the said godown for Kunal Chawla and their work is to get the cartons of liquor unloaded and supplied to various places. On asking about Vipin Yadav they refused to tell anything but on checking their mobiles, the number of Vipin Yadav was found in it and their were regular calls on the mobile. On being suspicious, the godown was searched thoroughly. The papers with regards to the material which was being unloaded from the trucks was demanded which could not be shown. The drivers of the truck disclosed their names as Sunil Kumar and Lalji. They also could not show the pa
Arun Bhandari Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors. : (2013) 2 SCC 801
Belsund Sugar Co. Ltd. v. State of Bihar
Directorate of Enforcement v. Deepak Mahajan
H.N. Rishbud v. State of Delhi
Hamida v. Rashid @ Rasheed and Others
Joseph Salvaraj A. Vs. State of Gujarat and Ors. : (2011) 7 SCC 59
Kunwar Pal Singh Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh : (2020) 14 SCC 331
M. Krishnan Vs. Vijay Singh & Anr. : (2001) 8 SCC 645
Md. Allauddin Khan Vs. State of Bihar : (2019) 6 SCC 107
Nallapareddy Sridhar Reddy Vs. The State of Andhra Pradesh : (2020) 12 SCC 467
M. Palanisamy v. State of T.N.
M. N. Ojha Vs. Alok Kumar Srivastava : (2009) 9 SCC 682
Ratilal Bhanji Mithani Vs. State of Maharashtra and others : (1979) 2 SCC 179
Rajeev Kourav Vs. Balasaheb & others : (2020) 3 SCC 317
R.P. Kapur Vs. State of Punjab : AIR 1960 SC 866
Shueb Mahmood Kidwai @ Bobby Vs. State of U.P. : (2021) (0) Supreme (All) 122
State (NCT of Delhi) v. Sanjay
State of Bihar v. Murad Ali Khan
State of Rajasthan v. Hat Singh
State of Maharashtra Vs. Sayyed Hassan Sayyed Subhan : (2019) 18 SCC 145
Shueb Mahmood Kidwai @ Bobby Vs. State of U.P. : Criminal Misc. 482/378/407 No. 3044 of 2017
Sharat Babu Digumarti v. State (NCT of Delhi)
T.S. Baliah v. T.S. Rangachari
Trisuns Chemical Industry Vs. Rajesh Agarwal and Ors. : (1999) 8 SCC 686
Vishalbhai Rameshbhai Khurana v. State of Gujarat
Zandu Pharmaceuticals Works Ltd. Vs. Mohammd Shariful Haque : (2005) 1 SCC 122
The evidence produced by the accused in his defense cannot be looked into by the court at the pre-trial stage. The court's power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash criminal proceedings is to prevent ....
Failure to comply with mandatory search procedures under the A.P. Excise Act vitiates criminal proceedings, constituting an abuse of process.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for a prima facie case to be made out against the accused and the limitations on the court's power to appreciate evidence at the pr....
The High Court may exercise inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash criminal proceedings if the dispute involves compoundable offences under the Excise Act to prevent the abuse of process ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.