P. B. BAJANTHRI, ARUN KUMAR JHA
BVG India Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
P. B. Bajanthri, J. –
CWJC No. 16899 of 2022
In the instant writ petition, petitioners have prayed for the following relief/reliefs: –
“a. For quashing and setting aside the minutes of meeting of the Technical Committee (Respondent No. 3) dated 22.11.2022 (“impugned order”) issued on 28.11.2022 as contained in Annexure P/1, by which the Petitioners have been held to be disqualified in technical bid in the most arbitrary manner, contrary to principles of natural justice, illegally as well as having without jurisdiction.
b. For directing the State Health Society, Bihar (Respondent No. 2) to declare the petitioners as technically qualified and consequently open their financial bid in relation to the Notice Inviting Tender (NIT) bearing reference no. 01/SHSB/PPP(AMBULANCE)/2022-23.
c. For issuing appropriate orders restraining the respondent authorities from opening financial bid and handing over the work order (in relation to the tender in furtherance of Notice Inviting Tender (NIT) Reference no., 01/SHSB/PPP(Ambulance)/2022-23 to any of the bidders until the pendency of the present
Poddar Steel Corporation vs. Ganesh Engineering Works
B.S.N. Joshi & Sons Ltd. vs. Nair Coal Services Ltd.
Silppi Constructions Contractors vs. Union of India
Dutta Associates Pvt. Ltd vs. Indo Merchatiles Pvt. Ltd
M/s N.G. Projects Ltd. vs. M/s Vinod Kumar Jain
Reliance Energy Ltd. vs. Maharashtra State Road Development Corp. Ltd.
Municipal Corporation, Ujjain vs. BVG India Ltd.
New Horizons Ltd. vs. Union of India
M/s N.G. Projects Ltd. vs. M/s Vinod Kumar Jain
National High Speed Rail Corpn. Ltd. vs. Montecarlo Ltd.
New Horizons Ltd. vs. Union of India
State Bank of Travancore vs. Kingston Computers India Pvt. Ltd.
Cox and Kings India Ltd. vs. Indian Railways Catering and Tourism Corporation Ltd.
Reliance Energy Ltd. vs. Maharashtra State Road Development Corp. Ltd.
Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corp. vs. Anoj Kumar Agarwala
Rule 23(16)(iv) of Assam Public Procurement Act, 2020 is reproduced Bidders securing specified minimum percent of marks or having fulfilled specific minimum achievement norms as fixed may be consider....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the disqualification of a bidder must be justified, and an unsuccessful bidder cannot challenge the qualification of other bidders.
The decision-making process of the tendering authority should be respected unless there is mala fide or perversity, and the court should only interfere in tender matters in furtherance of public inte....
Transparency and adherence to eligibility criteria in public procurement are crucial to ensure fairness and integrity, as showcased in the invalidation of selections based on procedural irregularitie....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.