JITENDRA KUMAR
Md. Taiyab Khan – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
Jitendra Kumar, J. – The present petition, under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred by the petitioner impugning the order dated 16.05.2016 passed by Ld. Additional Sessions Judge-IV, Aurangabad in Cr. Rev. No. 48 of 2015 (6 of 2015) whereby Ld. A.S.J. has set aside the order dated 16.05.2015 passed by Ld. Executive Magistrate, Aurangabad in criminal proceeding bearing No. 1629 of 2014 (22 of 2015) whereby Ld. Executive Magistrate had rejected the petition of Respondent No.2, Brijnanadan Singh for dropping the proceeding on the ground of pendency of Title Suit No. 386 of 2014 before Ld. Sub-Judge-I, Aurangabad.
2. Relevant facts, as emerging from the record, are that on the basis of report of the local police station, the proceeding under Section 144 Cr.P.C. was initiated between Md. Taiyab Khan and Sri Brijnandan Singh @ Bablu Singh. The same proceeding under Section 144 Cr.P.C. was converted into a proceeding under Section 145 Cr.P.C. vide order dated 14.10.2014 and during pendency of the proceeding under Section 145 Cr.P.C. the said Brijnandan Singh @ Bablu Singh moved an application before Ld. Executive Magistrate to drop the proceeding under Section 145 Cr.P.C. on the ground
Shanti Kumar Panda vs. Shakuntala Devi
Chandu Naik vs. Sitaram B. Naik
Kaushal Mishra vs. Raj Kumar Mishra, 2008 CrLJ(NOC) 272 (GAU
Chirstalin Costa vs. State of Goa
Ram Sumer Puri Mahant vs. State of U.P.
Jhummamal @ Devandas vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Prakash Chand Sachdeva vs. State
Atahaul Haque vs. Md. Allauddin
Amresh Tiwari vs. Lalta Prasad Dubey
Nand Kishore Prasad Sah vs. State of Bihar
Gyandeo Sharma vs. State of Bihar
Mahar Jahan vs. State of Delhi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.