SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Pat) 832

MOHIT KUMAR SHAH
Satish Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Manoj Kumar Ambastha.
For the Respondents: None.

Mohit Kumar Shah, J. – The present writ petition has been filed for quashing the order dated 05.04.2014, passed by the Executive Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Lalganj, District-Vaishali i.e. the respondent no. 3, whereby and whereunder the services of the petitioner has been terminated.

2. The brief facts of the case, according to the petitioner, are that the petitioner had applied in the office of the Nagar Panchayat, Lalganj, District-Vaishali i.e. the respondent no. 2 for being appointed as Clerk after a notice dated 18.02.2011 was published in the Nagar Panchayat office, whereafter he was called for interview on 30.03.2011 in the office of the respondent no. 3 and was selected and appointed as Clerk on contractual basis vide Memo dated 17.05.2011. After completion of one year, the services of the petitioner was further extended for a period of two years vide Memo dated 27.02.2012, however, in the meantime, one Dilip Thakur had filed a writ petition bearing C.W.J.C. no. 23317 of 2012 and a co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 25.03.2014, had restrained the petitioner from performing his duties as also it was directed that no payment be made to him till further orders.

3. T

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top