Back
ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH, SHAILENDRA SINGH
Shiv Prakash Rai S/o Late Nageshwar Rai – Appellant
Versus
Bihar School Examination Board – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH, J.
1. Heard Mr. Dinu Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Bishwa Bibhuti Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the State, Mr. Anil Singh, learned counsel for the Vigilance and Mr. Gyan Shankar, learned counsel for the Bihar School Examination Board. We have also heard Mr. Siddharth Prasad, learned amicus curiae in the matter.
2. The petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs in the present writ petition, which has been filed as a public interest litigation:
The judgment emphasizes the importance of following proper legal procedures for lodging a complaint or initiating an inquiry, and highlights the requirement of obtaining prior approval for investigat....
Approaching the police for filing an FIR and obtaining sanction for initiating an investigation against a public servant under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 are essential legal requirements.
Public interest litigations must be genuine and not motivated by personal agendas; previous judgments on similar issues bind the parties, barring new petitions.
The Court requires inquiries into allegations of public fund embezzlement and underscores the need for accountability in government schemes.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
