Back
RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD
Raju Prasad – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
ORDER
Petitioner in the present case is seeking the following reliefs: –
“(i) For issuance of a writ in the nature of Certiorari for quashing of the order contained in Memo no.1103 dated 9-5-22 (Anx.-25) passed by the District Magistrate, Patna by which in exercise of the power conferred under Rule 14(ix) of the Bihar Government Servant (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules-2005 as amended 2007, by way of punishment the District Magistrate, Patna has imposed punishment to the petitioner of compulsory retirement of the petitioner w.e.f. the date of issuance of the said order i.e. w.e.f. 9.5.22.
(ii) For issuance of an appropriate writ directing and commanding the respondents to give the petitioner all consequential benefits including to allow the petitioner to continue in his service till the date of retirement of the petitioner as well as payment of arrear salary to the petitioner after quashing of the aforesaid order contained in Memo no.1103 dated 9.5.2022 (Anx.-25). (iii) For any other relief/reliefs of which the petitioner is legally entitled to.”
2. I.A. No.01 of 2022 has been filed seeking the following reliefs: –
“1. That this an application on behalf of the petitioner for
Violation of procedural rules and failure to consider the petitioner's defence and reply to show-cause led to the setting aside of the impugned order.
Violation of Rule 17 of the Bihar C.C.A Rules, 2005 led to the setting aside of the impugned order and remittance of the matter for consideration in accordance with the law.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
