IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
SANDEEP KUMAR, J.
Criminal Misc. No. 65898 of 2023
(6.12.2023)
Rampravesh Diswa ... Petitioner
vs.
State of Bihar ... Opp. Party
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 – Section 36A – Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 – Section 167(2) – Default bail – Recovery of Ganja – In case of offences punishable under Section 19 or Section 24 or Section 27A or for offences involving commercial quantity, charge-sheet can be submitted within 180 days and if charge-sheet is not submitted within 180 days, accused is entitled for default bail – Public Prosecutor may take extension of time for filing charge-sheet and 180 days time can be extended for a period up to one year after Public Prosecutor files progress report of investigation and gives specific reasons for detention of accused beyond period of 180 days – In present case, Special Public Prosecutor has not filed any application for extension of period of charge-sheet and charge-sheet, as per contention of petitioner, has been filed without FSL report – Filing of incomplete charge-sheet without FSL report in NDPS cases is no charge-sheet in eye of law – Petitioner should not have been kept in custody once incomplete charge-sheet was filed without FSL report – Application allowed and bail granted. (Paras 6, 7, 10, 11 and 12)
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 – Section 167(2) – Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 – Section 36A – Default bail – Default bail is a right which cannot be denied to petitioner – For grant of default bail, petitioner is not required to file application – It is for Court to consider that charge-sheet has not been filed in time and petitioner is given liberty to execute bail bonds – Non-filing of charge-sheet will include filing of incomplete charge-sheet without FSL report in NDPS cases to defeat benefit of default bail to accused and because of act of investigating agency of filing incomplete charge-sheet without FSL report in NDPS cases, petitioner cannot be kept in judicial custody. (Para 10)
ORDER
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Raj Kishore Singh, learned APP for the State.
2. A supplementary affidavit has been filed by the petitioner bringing on record the fact that he is an accused in another case of similar nature in which he has been granted bail.
3. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Tr. No. 29 of 2023 arising out of Bhangaha P.S. Case No. 17 of 2023 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 20, 22, 23, 24 and 27 of the NDPS Act.
4. As per the prosecution case, 20.170 Kg. of ganja has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner.
5. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the charge sheet has been submitted without the FSL report and the charge sheet having been submitted without FSL report is an incomplete charge sheet and the petitioner is entitled for grant of default bail under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C. He has taken this Court to the provision of Section 36A of The Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, which reads as follows: –
“36A. Offences triable by Special Courts. – (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), –
(a) all offences under this Act which are punishable with imprisonment for a term of more than three years shall be triable only by the Special Court constituted for the area in which the offence has been committed or where there are more Special Courts than one for such area, by such one of them as may be specified in this behalf by the Government;
(b) where a person accused of or suspected of the commission of an offence under this Act is forwarded to a Magistrate under sub-section (2) or sub-section (2A) of Section 167 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), such Magistrate may authorise the detention of such person in such custody as he thinks fit for a period not exceeding fifteen days in the whole where such Magistrate is a Judicial Magistrate and seven days in the whole where such Magistrate is an Executive Magistrate:
Provided that in cases which are triable by the Special Court where such Magistrate considers –
(i) when such person is forwarded to him as aforesaid; or
(ii) upon or at any time before the expiry of the period of detention authorised by him, that the detention of such person is unnecessary, he shall order such person to be forwarded to the Special Court having jurisdiction;
(c) the Special Court may exercise, in relation to the person forwarded to it under clause (b), the same power which a Magistrate having jurisdiction to try a case may exercise under Section 167 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), in relation to an accused person in such case who has been forwarded to him under that section;
(d) a Special Court may, upon perusal of police report of the facts constituting an offence under this Act or upon complaint made by an officer of the Central Government or a State Government authorised in his behalf, take cognizance of that offence without the accused being committed to it for trial.
(2) When trying an offence under this Act, a Special Court may also try an offence other than an offence under this Act with which the accused may, under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), be charged at the same trial
(3) Nothing contained in this section shall be deemed to affect the special powers of the High Court regarding bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), and the High Court may exercise such powers including the power under cluase (b) of sub-section (1) of that section as if the reference to “Magistrate” in that section included also a reference to a “Special Court” constituted under section 36.
(4) In respect of persons accused of an offence punishable under Section 19 or Section 24 or Section 27A or for offences involving commercial quantity the references in sub-section (2) of Section 167 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974) thereof to “ninety days”, where th
(1) Default bail – Filing of incomplete charge-sheet without FSL report in NDPS cases is no charge-sheet in eye of law – Petitioner should not have been kept in custody once incomplete charge-sheet w....
Filing a challan without the FSL report in a case under the NDPS Act does not constitute a complete challan, entitling the accused to default bail under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C.
The absence of the FSL report in the charge sheet, if filed within the prescribed period, does not entitle the accused to default bail under the NDPS Act.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the significance of the FSL report in completing the investigation in NDPS Act cases and the accused's right to default bail under Section 167(2) C....
The non-filing of FSL reports with the charge sheet in NDPS cases does not entitle the accused to default bail.
The significance of the FSL report in determining the completeness of a challan and the need for compliance with procedural requirements for seeking extension of time for investigation under the NDPS....
The FSL report is crucial in establishing the contraband nature of recovered substances under the NDPS Act, distinguishing it from other offenses and influencing the grant of bail.
The necessity of the FSL report in the challan under Section 173 Cr.P.C. for establishing a case under the NDPS Act and granting default bail.
The right to default bail under Section 167(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code is extinguished upon the filing of a supplementary charge-sheet with the required report and the Court taking cognizance.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.