Sanjeev Kumar @ Bitthu vs State of Bihar

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(Pat) 1096

CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH, NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY
Sanjeev Kumar @ Bitthu – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant : M/s Shashank Chandra, Kumari Shubham, Ranjan Kumar (in both).
For the Respondent: Mr. Abhimanyu Sharma (in both).

Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J.—As both the appeals, preferred under Section 374(2) of the CrPC, arise out of the same judgment of conviction dated 13.09.2021 and the order of sentence dated 15.09.2021 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-VIth-cum-Special Judge POCSO Act, Samastipur, in T.R. No. 184 of 2021 and R.N. No. 1163 of 2018, they have been heard together and are being disposed of by the present judgment and order. By the judgment and order aforesaid, the appellants have been convicted and sentenced as under:—

Cr. Appeal (D.B.) No. 696 of 2021

	Convicted under Sections	Imprisonment	Sentence Fine (Rs.)	In default of fine
Sanjeev Kumar	363 of the IPC	R.I. for Seven years	5,000/-	S.I. for one month
@ Bitthu @ Bittu	366-A of the IPC	R.I. for 10 years	10,000/-	S.I. for two months
	376-DA of the IPC (under the provisions of alternate punishment U/s 42 POCSO Act)	R.I. for Life	50,000/-	-

Cr. Appeal (D.B.) No. 763 of 2021

Santosh Sahani	363 of the IPC	R.I. for Seven years	5,000/-	S.I. for one month
@ Bantha	366-A of the IPC	R.I. for 10 years	10,000/-	S.I. for two months
	376-DA of the IPC (under the provisions of a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2023 Supreme(Pat) 1096

CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH, NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEYSanjeev Kumar @ Bitthu – AppellantVersusState of Bihar – Respondent

Cases Referred (3)

CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH, NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY
Sanjeev Kumar @ Bitthu – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent