Ghurahu Ram, Son of Nathuni Ram vs State Of Bihar

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(Pat) 1001

CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH, KHATIM REZA
Ghurahu Ram, Son of Nathuni Ram – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Ravi Shankar Sahai, Mr. Chandra Mohan Jha.
For the Respondent: Ms. Shashi Bala Verma.

JUDGMENT :

(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J.)

This appeal has been preferred by the appellant under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) assailing the judgment of conviction dated 08.04.2019 and order of sentence dated 11.04.2019 passed by the learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Kaimur at Bhabua in POCSO Trial No. 25 of 2016 arising out of Bhabua P.S. Case No. 330 of 2016, whereby the appellant has been convicted and sentenced as under:

Conviction under Section	Sentence
Conviction under Section	Imprisonment	Fine (Rs.)	In default of fine
344 of the Indian Penal Code	S.I. for three years	-	-
323 of the Indian Penal Code	One year imprisonment	-	-
366 of the Indian Penal Code	R.I. for Ten years	10,000/-	-
376D read with 376(2) (n) of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 6 of the POCSO Act	For Life	30,000/-	-

2. We have heard Mr. Ravi Shankar Sahai, learned counsel for the appellant and Ms. Shashi Bala Verma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

3. The informant (P.W.-7) is the father of the victim (P.W.-3). Based

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2022 Supreme(Pat) 1001

CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH, KHATIM REZAGhurahu Ram, Son of Nathuni Ram – AppellantVersusState Of Bihar – Respondent

Cases Referred (1)

CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH, KHATIM REZA
Ghurahu Ram, Son of Nathuni Ram – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent