SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Pat) 23

P. B. BAJANTHRI, RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA
Sanjeev Kumar Tiwary – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr.Rohit Kumar.
For the Respondent: Mr.P.K. Shahi (A.G).

ORDER

Prima facie, we find there is no proper investigation conducted by the Investigating Officer. Therefore, Superintendent of Police, Samastipur is hereby requested to nominate good and efficient Police Officer as Investigating Officer. Thereafter, time limit should be stipulated to the newly appointed Investigating Officer to undertake further investigation in the matter and apprise this Court before the next date of hearing.

2. Relist this matter on 04.03.2024.

3. The Investigating Officer was required to apply his/her mind with different techniques in respect of interrogation. In order to elicit truth, such mechanism has not been followed by the present Investigating Officer. This court has come across ‘STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR CASES OF MISSING CHILDREN’ which was notified on 23.11.2016. This procedure has not been followed by the Police department officials in respect of missing persons in the State of Bihar. In fact, Annexure – 1 to the aforementioned procedure is relating to ‘PROCESS TO BE FOLLOWED UPON RECEIPT OF MISSING CHILD COMPLAINT’ are as under:—

4. Guidelines for the investigation of kidnapping/missing/abduction cases in Delhi has been framed. Similar guidelin

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top