Kumod Mandal Son of Bachneshwar Mandal vs State Of Bihar

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(Pat) 1148

CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH, NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY
Kumod Mandal Son of Bachneshwar Mandal – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Pramod Mishra, Adv., Mr. Suraj Kumar, Adv.
For the Respondent: Mr. Sujit Kumar Singh, APP

JUDGMENT :

Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J.

This appeal has been preferred by the appellant under Section 374 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure for setting aside the judgment of conviction dated 25.01.2021 and the order of sentence dated 29.01.2021 passed by Sri Motish Kumar Singh, the learned Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum- Special Judge, (POCSO), Saharsa in POCSO Case No. 20 of 2018, arising out of Saharsa Mahila P.S. Case No. 15 of 2018, whereby he has been convicted and sentenced as under:-

Conviction under Section	Sentence
Conviction under Section	Imprisonment	Fine (Rs.)	In default of fine
376 of the IPC	RI for 20 years	50,000/-	SI for three months
341 of the IPC	SI for 1 month	xxx	xxx
4 of the POCSO Act	RI for 20 years	50,000/-	SI for three months

2. All sentences have been ordered to run concurrently and benefit of Section 428 of Cr.P.C. has been ordered to be given.

3. The victim (PW-8), who is a minor girl of 12 years of the age (as per prosecution version), has given her Fardbeyan before S.H.O., Simri police station on 01.03.2008 at about 10:30 P.M. stating therein that on 27.02.2018 at about 3:00 P.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2023 Supreme(Pat) 1148

CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH, NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEYKumod Mandal Son of Bachneshwar Mandal – AppellantVersusState Of Bihar – Respondent

CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH, NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY
Kumod Mandal Son of Bachneshwar Mandal – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent