ARVIND SRIVASTAVA, SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA
Abhinandan Sah @ Abhinandan Kumar Sah – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
Sunil Dutta Mishra, J. – Heard learned senior counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for the State.
2. This criminal appeal has been preferred against the judgment dated 15.12.2021 and sentence dated 21.12.2021 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge VI-cum-Special Judge (POCSO Act), Purnea in connection with Special Case No.93 of 2019 (CIS No.93 of 2019) arising out of Sarsi P.S. Case No.180 of 2019 whereby and whereunder the appellant has been convicted under Section 376 of the I.P.C. and Section 4 of the POCSO Act and sentenced him for rigorous imprisonment for 14 years under Section 4 of the POCSO Act with a fine of Rs.50,000/- and in default of payment of fine, the appellant has been directed to undergo additional rigorous imprisonment for three months. It has further been directed that the period of detention undergone by the appellant shall be set off against the sentence imposed and following the provision under Section 42 of the POCSO Act, the appellant is not liable to be punished or sentenced under Section 376 of the I.P.C. distinctly as he has already been sentenced for the offence under Section 4 of the POCSO Act. It is further ordered that fine amount shall
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.