IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
P.B. BAJANTHRI, ARUN KUMAR JHA, JJ.
Kamal Kishore Prasad, Son of Late Yamuna Prasad - Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar and Ors. - Respondents
Letters Patent Appeal No.1076 of 2011 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11078 of 2007
Decided On : 25-04-2023
Pay Scale - Appellant's entitlement to pay scale - 35(2) of the Bihar State Universities Act - Rs. 8000/-to 13500/- - Summary of the acts and sections referenced and discussed by the court: The court discussed the appellant's entitlement to the pay scale as prescribed by the Board, the appointment against a non-sanctioned post, and the lack of approval from the State Government under Section 35(2) of the Bihar State Universities Act. The court also considered the case of Shri Vijay Pratap Singh and the absence of a sanctioned post for the Football Coach position.
Fact of the Case:
The appellant-petitioner sought writs for quashing a notification reducing his pay scale, granting him pay scale after completion of service, and making payments of arrears. The appellant was appointed as a Football Coach on a temporary basis and sought an upgraded pay scale based on a letter from the Inter University Sports Board of India. The appellant's pay scale was fixed at a lower rate than the existing replacement admissible pay scale, leading to the filing of the writ petition.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the appellant was appointed against a non-sanctioned post and that the appointment was illegal. The court also noted the lack of approval from the State Government for the appointment. The court dismissed the writ petition and the subsequent appeal, stating that the learned Single Judge did not commit any error warranting interference.
Issues: The core issue was the appellant's entitlement to the pay scale of Rs. 8000/-to 13500/-, as well as the legality of his appointment against a non-sanctioned post.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the appellant's appointment was illegal due to being against a non-sanctioned post and the lack of approval from the State Government. The court also noted the absence of a sanctioned post for the Football Coach position.
Final Decision: The Letters Patent Appeal was dismissed, with the court clarifying that the appellant would not be subjected to any impermissible recovery.
JUDGMENT :
(Arun Kumar Jha, J.)
Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for the respondents.
2. The present L.P.A. is directed against the order dated 27.09.2010 passed in CWJC No. 11078 of 2007 by the learned Single Judge of this Court whereby and whereunder the civil writ petition filed by the appellant has been dismissed.
3. In the writ petition, the appellant-petitioner has sought following relief :
4. Brief facts of the case are that the appellant-petitioner was appointed as Football Coach on 03.04.1975 vide University notification no. B/5233-38 issued under the signature of the Registrar on temporary basis in the pay scale of Rs.250-15-400/-. The appointment of the appellant was extended from time to time by the Vice Chancellor/ Registrar of the University by different orders and finally the Vice Chancellor of the University allowed the pay scale of Rs.500/-to 900/-admissible to grade III Football Coach along with other admissible allowances, w.e.f., 01.05.1978 vide office order dated 16.06.1978. The Inter University Sports Board of India (in short, ‘Board’) vide its letter dated 15.07.1975, addressed to the Sports Officer, Member, Universities/Institutes prescribed the revised pay scale of the NS NIS Coaches as announced by the Ministry of Education and Social Welfare. The appellant submitted a representation to the Vice Chancellor for upgradation of his scale of pay from Rs. 500/-to 900/-to the scale of pay Rs. 700-1100/-in view of the letter dated 15.07.1975 issued by the Board. The Vice Chancellor in consultation with the Secretary, University Sports Council, directed that the post of the appellant may be upgraded from IIIrd grade to IInd grade and he be allowed the scale of Rs.700-1100/-and the payment of his salary in the upgraded scale of pay might be made only after the approval of the State Government. Accordingly, the University vide its letter no. 5618 dated 08.11.1984 requested the Joint Secretary, Education Department. Govt. of Bihar, Patna for grant of appr
Legal entitlement to pay scales depends on prescribed qualifications, emphasizing adherence to natural justice principles in administrative decisions.
Points Of Law : Any amounts paid to appellants under order of the Principal dated or even under the order of learned Single Judge (if any) will not be sought to be recovered from appellants.
The Pay Verification Cell lacks authority to unilaterally modify pay scales set by statutory committees, affirming the jurisdiction of University committees in pay fixation.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.