SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
P.B. BAJANTHRI, ARUN KUMAR JHA, JJ.
Kamal Kishore Prasad, Son of Late Yamuna Prasad - Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar and Ors. - Respondents
Letters Patent Appeal No.1076 of 2011 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11078 of 2007
Decided On : 25-04-2023

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Ansas Manikant.
For the Respondents: Mr. Manoj Priaydarshi.

IMPORTANT POINT
The main legal point established in the judgment is the illegality of the appellant's appointment against a non-sanctioned post and the lack of approval from the State Government, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.

Headnote:

Pay Scale - Appellant's entitlement to pay scale - 35(2) of the Bihar State Universities Act - Rs. 8000/-to 13500/- - Summary of the acts and sections referenced and discussed by the court: The court discussed the appellant's entitlement to the pay scale as prescribed by the Board, the appointment against a non-sanctioned post, and the lack of approval from the State Government under Section 35(2) of the Bihar State Universities Act. The court also considered the case of Shri Vijay Pratap Singh and the absence of a sanctioned post for the Football Coach position.

Fact of the Case:

The appellant-petitioner sought writs for quashing a notification reducing his pay scale, granting him pay scale after completion of service, and making payments of arrears. The appellant was appointed as a Football Coach on a temporary basis and sought an upgraded pay scale based on a letter from the Inter University Sports Board of India. The appellant's pay scale was fixed at a lower rate than the existing replacement admissible pay scale, leading to the filing of the writ petition.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the appellant was appointed against a non-sanctioned post and that the appointment was illegal. The court also noted the lack of approval from the State Government for the appointment. The court dismissed the writ petition and the subsequent appeal, stating that the learned Single Judge did not commit any error warranting interference.

Issues: The core issue was the appellant's entitlement to the pay scale of Rs. 8000/-to 13500/-, as well as the legality of his appointment against a non-sanctioned post.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the appellant's appointment was illegal due to being against a non-sanctioned post and the lack of approval from the State Government. The court also noted the absence of a sanctioned post for the Football Coach position.

Final Decision: The Letters Patent Appeal was dismissed, with the court clarifying that the appellant would not be subjected to any impermissible recovery.

JUDGMENT :

(Arun Kumar Jha, J.)

Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for the respondents.

2. The present L.P.A. is directed against the order dated 27.09.2010 passed in CWJC No. 11078 of 2007 by the learned Single Judge of this Court whereby and whereunder the civil writ petition filed by the appellant has been dismissed.

3. In the writ petition, the appellant-petitioner has sought following relief :

    “i) For issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari or any other appropriate writ for quashing of the notification dated 02.02.2006 issued by the B.R. Ambedkar Bihar University (hereinafter referred to as ‘University’ only) whereby the pay scale of the petitioner has been reduced from the existing pay scale of Rs. 2200-Rs.4000/-(corresponding revised pay scale of Rs. 8000/-to 13500/-) to the revised pay scale of Rs. 6500/-to 10500/-in an erroneous manner. ii) For issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ for commanding the respondent to grant pay scale of grade II to the petitioner after completion of 5 years of service i.e. with effect from 03.04.1980, pay scale of grade I after completing 10 years of service i.e. with effect from 03.04.1985 and selection grade after completion of 12 years of service i.e. with effect from 03.04.1987 as per norms prescribed by the Inter University Sports Board of India (hereinafter referred to as ‘Board’ only) vide letter dated 15.07.1975 (Annexure2). iii) For issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ for commanding the respondents to make the payments of the arrears to the petitioner with admissible interest as per the aforesaid revised scale admissible to him. iv) For holding that the act of the respondent in not granting the corresponding pay scale to the petitioner as prescribed by the Inter University Sports Board of India mentioned in letter dated 15th July 1975 issued by it to the Sports Officers, Member Universities/ Institute as announced by the Ministry of Education and Social Welfare is highly arbitrary, unreasonable, against the settled principles of law as well as violative of the instruction, resolution and circulars issued by the competent authority from time to time. v) For issuance of any other appropriate writ order or direction which your Lordships may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.”

4. Brief facts of the case are that the appellant-petitioner was appointed as Football Coach on 03.04.1975 vide University notification no. B/5233-38 issued under the signature of the Registrar on temporary basis in the pay scale of Rs.250-15-400/-. The appointment of the appellant was extended from time to time by the Vice Chancellor/ Registrar of the University by different orders and finally the Vice Chancellor of the University allowed the pay scale of Rs.500/-to 900/-admissible to grade III Football Coach along with other admissible allowances, w.e.f., 01.05.1978 vide office order dated 16.06.1978. The Inter University Sports Board of India (in short, ‘Board’) vide its letter dated 15.07.1975, addressed to the Sports Officer, Member, Universities/Institutes prescribed the revised pay scale of the NS NIS Coaches as announced by the Ministry of Education and Social Welfare. The appellant submitted a representation to the Vice Chancellor for upgradation of his scale of pay from Rs. 500/-to 900/-to the scale of pay Rs. 700-1100/-in view of the letter dated 15.07.1975 issued by the Board. The Vice Chancellor in consultation with the Secretary, University Sports Council, directed that the post of the appellant may be upgraded from IIIrd grade to IInd grade and he be allowed the scale of Rs.700-1100/-and the payment of his salary in the upgraded scale of pay might be made only after the approval of the State Government. Accordingly, the University vide its letter no. 5618 dated 08.11.1984 requested the Joint Secretary, Education Department. Govt. of Bihar, Patna for grant of appr

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon Back to top