Purnendu Singh, J. – Heard Mr. Anand Kumar Ojha, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. Mrigank Mauli, learned Senior Counsel, assisted by Mr. Om Prakash, learned counsel, appearing for respondent No.9 and also learned Government Advocate No.2 appearing for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for following relief(s) in paragraph no. 1 of the writ petition; –

“That the petitioner prays for quashing the Requisition dated 02.012024 submitted directly to the executive officer on the ground that the minimum 1/3rd Panchayat Samiti Members never presented the requisition to the Pramukh as mandated under Section 44(3)(1) rendering all subsequent decision as nullity. No response of the executive officer on the suspicious requisition amounted to connivance and the petitioner further prays to hold and declare the letter NO. 01 dated 03.01.2024 passed by the executive Officer as illegal and collusive being breach of mandatory procedure and finally the petitioner seeks further declaration to hold and declare the special meeting dated 18.01.2024 as illegal on the ground that no deliberation took place on that day and that the special meeting was intended to create a platform to