IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK
Dr. B.R. Sarangi, J.
Shantilata Behera - Appellant
Versus
State Of Odisha & Ors. - Respondents
W.P.(C) No. 23267 of 2021
Decided On : 17-08-2021
no confidence motion - Chairman of Panchayat Samiti - Section 16, 18, 40-A, 46-B of the Odisha Panchayat Samiti Act, 1959 - The court dismissed the writ petition seeking to quash the no confidence notice and to allow the petitioner to continue in office as the Chairman of Bhapur Panchayat Samiti till completion of her tenure. The court held that the notice convening a special meeting for a no confidence motion was in accordance with the provisions of the Act and did not require interference.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, an elected Chairman of Bhapur Panchayat Samiti, sought to quash a no confidence notice and to continue in office till completion of her tenure. The notice was issued in response to a requisition signed by one-third members with the right to vote, along with a proposed resolution.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the notice convening the special meeting for the no confidence motion was in accordance with the provisions of the Act and did not require interference.
Issues: The issues revolved around the validity of the notice for the no confidence motion and the compliance with the provisions of the Odisha Panchayat Samiti Act, 1959.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the notice for the no confidence motion was issued in accordance with the provisions of Section 46-B of the Act, and therefore did not require interference.
Final Decision: The court dismissed the writ petition, stating that the notice convening the special meeting for the no confidence motion was in accordance with the provisions of the Act and did not require interference.
JUDGMENT
Dr. B.R. Sarangi, J. - The petitioner, who is an elected Chairman of Bhapur Panchayat Samiti constituted in consonance with the provisions under Section 16 of the Odisha Panchayat Samiti Act, 1959, has filed this writ petition seeking to quash the no confidence notice no. 696 dated 30.07.2021 under Annexure-5 issued by the Sub- Collector, Nayagarh, and to issue direction to the opposite parties to allow her to continue in office as the Chairman of Bhapur Panchayat Samiti till completion of her tenure of five years and further to construe Section 16 and 18 of the Odisha Panchayat Samiti Act, 1959 harmoniously so as to give proper effect to both the provisions, in so far as the election of the Chairman and her ouster is concerned.
2. The factual matrix of the case, in brief, is that the Sub-Collector, Nayagarh issued notification no. 1050/G.P. dated 31.08.2016, to hold the election for the post of Chairman, Panchayat Samiti for the year 2017 for three tire system, as per the reservation applicable after inviting objection in prescribed form-19. So far as Bhapur Gram Panchayat is concerned, the seat was reserved for Schedule Tribe (Woman). Accordingly, the election to the post of Chairman of Bhapur Panchayat Samiti was conducted and said Samiti was constituted in consonance with the provisions under Section 16 of the Odisha Panchayat Samiti Act, 1959 (hereinafter referred to 'Act, 1959'). As per the provisions contained under sub-Section (4) of Section 16 of the Act, 1959, the term of the office of the elected members of the Samiti including the Chairman and the Vice-Chairman shall be five years commencing on the date of the first meeting, as provided in Sub-section (3) of Section 16 of the Act, 1959. The first meeting of the Panchayat Samiti was held on 11.03.2017 in terms of the directive issued by the State Election Commission, Odisha and accordingly, the tenure of the petitioner, i.e., five years period would expire with effect from 10th day of March, 2022. After duly being elected, the petitioner has already completed four and half years in the office. As the elections to the panchayat bodies in the State were held in the month of March, 2017, the succeeding panchayats are to be constituted before completion of the said five years in accordance with Article 243E(3)(a) of the Constitution of India. The process of holding elections of panchayat bodies of the State has already been initiated by the State Government in its Panchayati Raj Department for undertaking delimitation of wards and reservation of seats in consonance with provisions engrafted in the Act, 1959.
2.1 Bhapur Panchayat Samiti consists of 42 members including M.L.A. and M.P. On 13.07.2021, eighteen Sarpanchs and Panchayat Samiti Members of Bhapur Panchayat Samiti submitted a requisition duly signed by one-third members with right to vote, along with proposed resolution, to the opposite party no.3, i.e. Sub- Collector, Nayagarh with respect to taking steps for having an extraordinary meeting of the Panchayat Samiti for adopting vote of no confidence against the petitioner, who is the Chairperson of Bhapur Panchayat Samiti. Along with the letter addressed to the Sub-Collector, a resolution dated 13.07.2021 was attached wherein eighteen Sarpanchas and Samiti Members have resolved that they have no confidence on the Chairman. On receipt of the above mentioned requisition, along with proposed resolution, the opposite party no.3-Sub-Collector, Nayagarh, vide letter no. 542 dated 14.07.2021, requested the opposite party no.4, BDO, Bhapur Block to take necessary steps in verifying the genuineness of signatures of members, who have moved the requisition and further requested to provide the requisite postal address of all members of Samiti having right to vote within three days. After receipt of the letter sent by opposite party no.3, the opposite party no,4- BDO, Bhapur immediately constituted a committee consisting of himself along with ABDO, AE and PA in order
Jagadish Pradhan and Ors. V. Kapileswar Pradhan and Others
Parbati Hembram v. State of Odisha
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the notice for the no confidence motion was issued in accordance with the provisions of the Odisha Panchayat Samiti Act, 1959, and therefore d....
Members of Panchayat Samiti, including MLAs and MPs, possess the right to vote in no confidence motions, as per Section 18(2) of the Odisha Panchayat Samiti Act, contrary to any informal directives l....
The court upheld the validity of the no confidence motion requisition under the Bihar Panchayat Raj Act, confirming the necessity for clear allegations and the petitioner's failure to disclose key fa....
The court affirmed that a second No Confidence Motion is permissible if the first requisition did not lead to a valid meeting or vote, as per the Bihar Panchayat Raj Act, 2006.
The court ruled that compliance with procedural safeguards under the Odisha Gram Panchayat Act, 1964 is critical for no-confidence motions, affirming that minor deviations do not invalidate democrati....
Procedural safeguards under Section 24 of the Odisha Gram Panchayat Act are mandatory for no-confidence motions; late notice receipt does not invalidate proceedings absent demonstrable prejudice.
Compliance with procedural safeguards under Section 24 of the Odisha Gram Panchayat Act is crucial, but minor deviations that do not demonstrate prejudice may not invalidate no-confidence proceedings....
Compliance with procedural laws in no-confidence motions under the Odisha Grama Panchayats Act is essential, though timing of notice receipt versus issuance holds significance in evaluating valid par....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.