Rajiv Roy, J.—Heard Mr. Lalit Kishore, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners (in CWJC No. 12087 of 2024) while Mr. Amit Srivastava, learned Senior Counsel is representing petitioner, Mr. Pushkar Narain Shahi for respondent nos. 7 and 13 (in CWJC No. 9077 of 2024) duly assisted by Mr. Ansul, Mr. Gautam Kumar Yadav, learned AC to GP-26 and Mr. Ravi Ranjan/Mr. Girish Pandey, learned counsel for the State Election Commission.

(A) PRAYER:

2. The writ petition has been preferred by Yasmin Aash @ Yasmin Parween @ Yasmina Parween and Anjari Begum (CWJC No. 12087 of 2024) for the following reliefs:

(i) for issuance of an appropriate writ/writs in the nature of writ of certiorari for quashing the letter dated 25.07.2024 issued vide Respondent No. Letter 1 5674 No. by whereby the said respondent has directed the Respondent No. 2 to ensure holding of 'No Confidence Motion' against the petitioners in view of the requisition submitted before Petitioner No. 1 for holding special meeting for 'No Confidence Motion';

(ii) for quashing of Office Order issued by Memo No. 891 dated 05.08.2024 issued by Respondent No. 2 (District Magistrate, Kishanganj) whereby the said respondent has directed the Petitioner No. 1 to hold special meeting for discussion on 'No Confidence Motion' brought against Petitioner No. 1 by some of the Private Respondents by an earlier requisition dated 02.05.2024 presented by them;

(iii) for further writ/writs to respondents, restraining them the from directing the petitioners to hold special meeting for 'No Confidence Motion' till the disposal of C.W.J.C. No. 9077 of 2024 (Md. Mustaue and others versus the State of Bihar and others) which had been filed by the Private Respondents in which the issue involved is absolutely identical and the same is pending before the Hon'ble Court for adjudication, in which notices have been issued to Private Respondents and direction has been issued to file Counter Affidavit;

(iv) for any other relief/reliefs to which the petitioner is found entitled to in the facts and circumstances of the case.

3. The reliefs sought for by Md. Mushtaque and Others (CWJC No. 9077 of 2024) read as follows:

(i) for issuance of an appropriate writ in the nature of CERTIORARI or such other writ/order or direction, for quashing the Letter No. 443 dated 29.05.2024 issued by the Block Development Officer-cum-Executive Officer, Panchayat Samiti, Dighal Bank, whereby and where under he in a completely illegal and untenable manner; in colorable exercise of power; and, in teeth of Section 44(3)(i) of the Bihar Panchayat Raj Act, 2006 and also in utter disregard of the judgment of Hon'ble Division Bench in LPA No. 113/2020, since reported in 2021 (3) PLJR 346 and the Hon'ble Full Bench judgment in LPA No. 125/2024 dated 16.5.2024, he has refused to issue notices to elected members of Panchayat Samiti Dighal Bank for the Special Meting which was to be held on 07.06.2024 as fixed by the petitioners under Section 44(3)(i) of Bihar Panchayat Raj Act, 2006;

(ii) for issuance of an appropriate writ in the nature of CERTIORARI or such other writ/order or direction, for quashing the Letter No. 424 dated 16.05.2024 issued by the Block Development Officer-cum-Executive Officer, Panchayat Samiti, Dighal Bank, by which he has communicated the decision of the Pramukh, Panchayat Samiti, Dighal Bank whereby and where under she has in a completely illegal and untenable manner, in colorable exercise of power, and, in teeth of Section 44 (3)(i) of the Bihar Panchayat Raj Act, 2006 and also in utter disregard of the judgment of Hon'ble Division Bench in LPA No.113/2020, since reported in 2021 (3) PLJR 346 rejected Meeting of the Panchayat Samiti, Dighal Bank to consider the requisition of the petitioners dated 02.05.2024 which was submitted to her by Registered Speed Post for consideration of No Confidence Motion against her more particularly in view of the observations of the Hon'ble High Court as contained in paragraph no. 22 of the oral j