RAJIV ROY
Yasmin Aash – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
Rajiv Roy, J.—Heard Mr. Lalit Kishore, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners (in CWJC No. 12087 of 2024) while Mr. Amit Srivastava, learned Senior Counsel is representing petitioner, Mr. Pushkar Narain Shahi for respondent nos. 7 and 13 (in CWJC No. 9077 of 2024) duly assisted by Mr. Ansul, Mr. Gautam Kumar Yadav, learned AC to GP-26 and Mr. Ravi Ranjan/Mr. Girish Pandey, learned counsel for the State Election Commission.
(A) PRAYER:
2. The writ petition has been preferred by Yasmin Aash @ Yasmin Parween @ Yasmina Parween and Anjari Begum (CWJC No. 12087 of 2024) for the following reliefs:
(i) for issuance of an appropriate writ/writs in the nature of writ of certiorari for quashing the letter dated 25.07.2024 issued vide Respondent No. Letter 1 5674 No. by whereby the said respondent has directed the Respondent No. 2 to ensure holding of 'No Confidence Motion' against the petitioners in view of the requisition submitted before Petitioner No. 1 for holding special meeting for 'No Confidence Motion';
(ii) for quashing of Office Order issued by Memo No. 891 dated 05.08.2024 issued by Respondent No. 2 (District Magistrate, Kishanganj) whereby the said respondent has directed the Peti
The court affirmed that a second No Confidence Motion is permissible if the first requisition did not lead to a valid meeting or vote, as per the Bihar Panchayat Raj Act, 2006.
The court upheld the validity of the no confidence motion requisition under the Bihar Panchayat Raj Act, confirming the necessity for clear allegations and the petitioner's failure to disclose key fa....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.