SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Pat) 201

RAJIV ROY
Yamuni Devi – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: M/s Manish Kumar No 13, Rohit Kumar, Priti Kumari.
For the Respondents: Mr. Md. Khurshid Alam, A.A.G.-12.

ORDER

Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State.

2. The present petition has been preferred for: –

a Certiorari setting aside the order dated 04/12/2015 passed in B.L.T. Case No. 662 of 2014 by Hon'ble Member Administrative, Bihar Land Tribunal, Patna, as contained in Annexure - 6, whereby and where under the order dated 09/03/2013, passed by the Circle Officer, Marauna, Supaul in Basgit Parcha Revision Case No. - 181 of 2007 was quashed without properly consider the material facts and circumstances that on the same Khata of land, private respondents (petitioners before Hon'ble Tribunal) have filed Title Suit, which was subject matter before Hon'ble Tribunal, in which petitioner was made respondent.

3. Learned Counsel for the petitioner after a long argument submitted that though the Bihar Land Tribunal (henceforth for short ‘the B.L.T.’) in its order dated 04.12.2015 directed the petitioner herein to prefer Title Suit, a Title Suit No. 327 of 2014 has already been preferred by the respondent nos. 7 to 9 (the original petitioners before ‘the B.L.T.’) which is pending in the Court of learned Sub Judge-1, Supaul.

4. He submits that both the petitioners as well as the respond

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top