SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Pat) 209

MOHIT KUMAR SHAH
Gautam Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: M/s Shrishti Singh, Pranav Kumar.
For the State : M/s Ajay, GA-5, Pratik Kumar, Sinha, AC to GA-5.

Mohit Kumar Shah, J. – The present writ petition has been filed for directing the Respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for appointment on the post of Technical Assistant in the Panchayati Raj Department in the District of Sheohar, advertised vide notice dated 03.08.2018, under the Physically Handicapped Category.

2. The brief facts of the case, according to the petitioner, are that an advertisement dated 03.08.2018 was issued for the purposes of making appointment on the vacant post of Technical Assistant and Accountant-cum-IT Assistant, wherein, apart from the eligibility criteria being specified in Clause-7, it was mentioned that the selection process would be conducted in light of the Government’s Resolution No. 4046 dated 25.7.2018, which in turn postulates, under Clause 3 (iii) thereof that the reservation shall be as per the notification issued by the State Government from time to time.

3. The petitioner had applied for the post of Technical Assistant in the EBC (physically handicapped) Category, whereafter, his application was processed and his name was published in the counselling list at serial no. 54 and he was shown to be an EBC (physically handicapped) candi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top