VIPUL M. PANCHOLI, SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA
Ram Nath Sahni S/o Kishori Sahni – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
VIPUL M. PANCHOLI, J.
The present appeal has been filed under Section-374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred as ‘Cr.P.C.’) challenging the judgment of conviction dated 07.06.2023 and order of sentence dated 14.06.2023 passed by learned learned Additional Sessions Judge-VI-Cum-Special Judge, POCSO, Madhubani, in connection with G.R. POCSO Case No. 43 of 2020 (arising out of Kaluahi P.S. Case No. 116 of 2020) by which the appellant/convict has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life and a fine of Rs. 20, 000/-(Rupees twenty thousand only) and in default of payment of fine, further three month Simple Imprisonment for the offence u/S-302 of the I.P.C. Further the convict has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life, which shall mean imprisonment for the remainder of natural life of the convict and fine of Rs. 20,000/-(Rupees twenty thousand only) and in default of payment of fine, further three month Simple Imprisonment for the offence u/S-6 of the POCSO Act (read with Section 376(A) and 376(D) of the I.P.C. as per provision of Section-42 of POCSO Act). Both the sentences have been directed to run concurrently.
2. H
Anant Chintaman Lagu v. State of Bombay
Anjan Kumar Sarma & Ors. Vs. State of Assam
Brahm Swaroop v. State of U.P.
Deonandan Mishra v. State of Bihar
Hanumant v. State of Madhya Pradesh 1952 SCR 1091 : (AIR 1952 SC 343)
Jaharlal Das v. State of Orissa
M.G. Agarwal v. State of Maharashtra
Malleshappa v. State of Karnataka
Mohan Lal Pangasa v. State of U.P.
Mohibur Rahman v. State of Assam
Naseem Ahmed v. Delhi Administration
Ramgopal v. State of Maharashtra
Ravi & Anr. Vs. State of Karnataka
Ravi Sharma Vs. State (Government of NCT of Delhi) & Anr
Shankarlal Gyarasilal Dixit v. State of Maharashtra
Sharad Birdhichand Sarda Vs. State of Maharashtra
The court upheld the conviction under IPC Section 302, emphasizing that circumstantial evidence must form a complete chain, proving guilt beyond reasonable doubt without the accused providing an adeq....
Point of Law : Contradictory statements regarding extra judicial confession made by the accused/appellant, we are of the view that such type of extra judicial confession has no such value in the eye ....
In a murder conviction based on circumstantial evidence, multiple corroborative factors, including the last seen theory and absence of alternative explanations, can establish guilt beyond reasonable ....
Circumstantial evidence, including motive and last seen theory, can establish guilt in murder cases when direct evidence is unavailable.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.