IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
ANIL KUMAR SINHA, J.
Ram Udgar Chaudhary S/o Sri Fudar Chaudhary – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Bihar – Respondents
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.338 of 2011
Decided on : 02-04-2024
EMPLOYMENT - Panchayat Teacher Appointment - Bihar Panchayat Teachers (Appointment and Service Conditions) Rules, 2006 - The court discussed the Bihar Panchayat Teachers (Appointment and Service Conditions) Rules, 2006, particularly focusing on the provisions that abolished the post of Panchayat Shiksha Mitra (P.S.M.) after 01.07.2006. The court interpreted that any appointment made after this date was invalid, and emphasized the importance of following the rules regarding appointment and service conditions. The court concluded that the reinstatement of the respondent was in violation of these rules and principles of natural justice.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner was appointed as Panchayat Shiksha Mitra (P.S.M.) in 2005, while the respondent no. 11 contested this appointment claiming he had higher qualifications. After an inquiry, the respondent was directed to be appointed instead of the petitioner, but this was done after the 2006 Rules came into effect, which abolished the P.S.M. position.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the appointment of the respondent no. 11 was invalid as it occurred after the abolition of the P.S.M. post under the 2006 Rules. The court also noted that the petitioner was not given an opportunity to defend his position in the appeal process, violating principles of natural justice.
Issues: Whether the appointment of the respondent no. 11 as P.S.M. was valid under the 2006 Rules, and whether the petitioner was denied a fair hearing in the appeal process.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the post of P.S.M. was abolished after 01.07.2006, and any appointment made thereafter was illegal. The court also emphasized the necessity of adhering to principles of natural justice, which were violated in the appeal process.
Final Decision: The court set aside the order of the District Appellate Authority reinstating the respondent no. 11 and allowed the writ application of the petitioner.
JUDGMENT :
ANIL KUMAR SINHA, J.
The present writ application has been filed for quashing the order, dated 08.09.2010, passed by the District Appellate Authority, Madhubani, in Appeal Case No. 112/05/2010, by which the order, dated 05.06.2007, passed by the Block Education Extension Officer, Andhrathari, has been quashed and a direction was issued to reinstate the respondent no. 11.
2. The further prayer of the petitioner is to direct the concerned respondent not to disturb the peaceful functioning of the petitioner as Block Teacher, in the Upgraded Middle School, Murukiya, Andhrathari.
3. The brief facts of the case is that the petitioner as well as respondent no. 11 had applied for appointment on the post of Panchayat Shiksha Mitra (in short, the ‘P.S.M.’) in the year 2005, under Extremely Backward Class category, in the Gram Panchayati Raj Murukiya, Andhrathari block, in the district of Madhubani.
4. Altogether 13 posts were advertised in the said Gram Panchayat. As per roster, six posts were earmarked for male, out of which three posts were meant for unreserved male, and one post each for Backward Class category, Extremely Backward Class category and Scheduled caste category. The rest seven posts were earmarked for female candidates. The present dispute pertains to one post of Extremely Backward Class category only.
5. After scrutiny, the Sukh Suvidha Samiti prepared the merit list of the candidates applied for the post of P.S.M. under Extremely Backward Class category, on 24.05.2005, wherein the petitioner was placed at serial no. 8 and the name of respondent no. 11 figured at serial no. 9. The weightage of both, the petitioner as well as the respondent no. 11, was same, i.e. 15.
6. On the basis of merit list, the petitioner was selected as P.S.M., vide letter no. 2, dated 24.05.2005 and was posted in the Upgraded Middle School, Murukiya, where the petitioner submitted his joining on 25.05.2005. The contract of the petitioner as P.S.M. was renewed after completion of eleven months, vide letter no. 7, dated 11.05.2006. It is also not in dispute that after coming into force of the Bihar Panchayat Teachers (Appointment and Service Conditions) Rules, 2006 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the 2006 Rules’), the petitioner was absorbed as Panchayat Teacher.
7. The respondent no. 11 raised objection regarding appointment of the petitioner before the Block Development Officer, Andhrathari and also submitted application before the Janata Darbar of the District Magistrate, Madhubani, regarding malicious conduct of the Mukhiya and Panchayat Secretary of Gram Panchayati Raj Murukiya in appointing the petitioner.
8. The Sub Divisional Magistrate, Jhanjharpur, in the light of the direction issued by the District Magistrate, Madhubani, conducted an enquiry regarding the illegality committed in the appointment process of the P.S.Ms. in various Gram Panchayats, in Andhrathari block, including the Murukiya Gram Panchayat and upon enquiry, he has come to conclusion that the claim of respondent no. 11 is true that the petitioner, having lesser marks, has illegally been appointed on the post of P.S.M. The enquiry report was forwarded to the District Magistrate, Madhubani, vide letter no. VI-I/05-436, dated 28.06.2005.
9. On 09.09.2005, the Block Education Extension Officer, Andhrathari, issued a direction to the Panchayat Secretary of Murukiya Gram Panchayat to appoint respondent no. 11 within a week after cancelling the appointment of the petitioner. When no decision was taken by the Panchayat Secretary upon the direction issued by the Block Education Extension Officer, Andhrathari, the respondent no. 11 filed a complaint before the District Superintendent of Education, Madhubani, upon which the District Superintendent of Education, Madhubani, vide letter no. 2231, dated 11.09.2006, directed the Mukhiya and the Panchayat Secretary of Murukiya Gram Panchayat to take necessary action in this regard within a week.
10. In the light of the aforesaid direction, th
Alok Kumar and Others v. the State of Bihar and Others
Smt. Renu Kumari Pandey and Others v. The State of Bihar and Others
The abolition of the post of Panchayat Shiksha Mitra under the Bihar Panchayat Teachers (Appointment and Service Conditions) Rules, 2006, precludes any appointment to that position after 01.07.2006, ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the appointment of P.S.M. cannot be enquired into and cancelled retrospectively after the post's abolition on 01-07-2006 under Rule 20(iii) of....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the illegality of appointments made by the Panchayat Employment Committee, the entitlement of the writ petitioner to be offered appointment and con....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.