SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Pat) 89

PARTHA SARTHY
Namita Devi – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Ranjan Kumar Dubey.
For the Respondents: Mr. S.A. Alam.

Partha Sarthy, J. – Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State of Bihar and learned counsel for the respondent no.11.

2. The petitioner by filing the instant writ application prays for quashing the order contained in memo no.319 dated 4.8.2014 in Appeal Case no.71 of 2013 whereby the Presiding Officer, District Appellate Authority, Katihar was pleased to allow the appeal preferred by the respondent no.11 and set aside the appointment of the petitioner on the post of Panchayat Teacher.

3. The case of the petitioner in brief is that the petitioner along with others applied for appointment on the post of Panchayat Shiksha Mitra in Gram Panchayat Raj, Katihar. She appeared for counselling and pursuant to her appointment on 11.8.2005, gave her joining on 18.8.2005 in Primary School, Dhusmar. The petitioner has brought on record by way of annexures the appointment letter as also her joining letter.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that with coming of the Bihar Panchayat Primary Teachers (Appointment and Service Conditions) Rules, 2006 w.e.f. 1.7.2006, the post of Panchayat Shiksha Mitra stood abolished and all the persons workin

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top