SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Pat) 260

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Anjani Kumar Sharan, J.
Mundrika Prasad Son of late Ram Prasad - Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar and ors. – Respondents
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7765 of 2019
Decided On : 01-04-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Munna Prasad Singh, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. Pramod Kumar Singh, AC to SC-16, For the V.K.S. University:Mr. P.K. Verma, Sr. Advocate, Mrs. Nutan Sahay, Advocate, Dr. Anand Kumar, Advocate Mr. Rajan Prakash, Advocate

IMPORTANT POINT
A petitioner must meet the requisite qualifications set by governing authorities to be eligible for a revised pay scale; failure to meet such qualifications negates claims for salary adjustments.

Headnote:

MANDAMUS - PAY SCALE REVISIONS - The court addressed the petitioner's request for a writ of mandamus to revise his pay scale based on a university memo. The court interpreted the qualifications required for the pay scale and concluded that the petitioner did not meet the necessary criteria, leading to the dismissal of the writ application.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, a retired Store Keeper from Maharaja College, sought a writ to re-fix his pay scale and receive arrears based on a university memo that revised pay scales for Store Keepers effective from 01.04.1997.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the petitioner did not possess the requisite qualifications for the revised pay scale as stipulated by the State Government, which led to the conclusion that the petitioner's claims were not valid.

Issues: Whether the petitioner is entitled to the revised pay scale of Rs.5500-9000 based on the university's memo and whether he meets the qualifications required for that pay scale.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the petitioner, being matriculate, did not fulfill the educational qualifications necessary for the pay scale as per the guidelines issued by the State Government, thus rendering his application for a writ of mandamus unmeritorious.

Final Decision: The writ application was dismissed as the petitioner did not meet the qualifications required for the revised pay scale.

JUDGMENT :

Anjani Kumar Sharan, J.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. By the present writ application, the petitioner seeks following reliefs:

    (i) To issue a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to re-fix the pay scale of the petitioner with effect from 01.04.1997 in the pay scale of Rs.5000/-to 9000/-in view of memo no.665/Establishment/14 dated 22.08.2014 issued under the signature of Respondent no.6, the Registrar Veer Kuar Singh University, Ara.

(ii) To issue a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to re-calculate the pay scale and pay statement of the petitioner by a competent accountant authority and thereafter revised the salary and pensionary benefit of the petitioner in view of memo no.665/East/14 dated 22.08.2014 issued by the respondent no.6, the Registrar, Veer Kuar Singh University, Ara, Bhojpur.

(iii) To issue a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding and direct the respondents to pay the petitioner, arrear salary and arrear pensionary benefits which is payable to the petitioners with costs and interest of Rs.12% per annum.

(iv) Any other writ/writs, direction/ directions, order/orders for which the petitioner is entitled to in the facts and circumstances of the case.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner joined the service on the post of Lab bearer by the Governing Body of Maharaja College, Ara on 17.08.1968 in the Department of Psychology after following the norms of appointment in pay-scale of Rs.45/-to 60/-. Thereafter, the salary of the petitioner was fixed by the Magadh University on 21.10.1976 in the pay-scale of Rs.165/-204 on 01.03.1973 as affiliated college unit and also fixed on 1.1.1978 as constituent college vide M.U. letter no.1042 dated 05.05.88 Rs.190 to Rs.256/-. It is further submitted that thereafter time bound promotion was granted by the University with effect from 01.01.1981 and the pay-scale of the petitioner was fixed at Rs.425 – 605/-

4. It is further submitted that newly created Veer Kuar Singh University, Ara revised the pay-scale for the petitioner Rs.950-1400 from 01.01.1986. The petitioner was promoted to the post of Store Keeper in Botany Department with effect from 14.07.1995. Lastly, the pay of the petitioner was fixed by the University in the pay-scale of Rs.5200-20200. The petitioner retired from the service on 31.07.2012 from the post of Store Keeper in Botany Department from Maharaja College, Ara.

5. It is further submitted that the Registrar of the Veer Kuar Singh University, Ara issued a notification vide memo no.665 Estb/14 dated 22.08.2014 and fixed the pay-scale of Rs.5500-9000 to the Store Keeper who are working on the sanctioned post and appointed in accordance with rules and working without any break in service with effect from 01.04.1997.

6. It is further submitted that the petitioner finding him suitable and coming under the purview of memo no.665 Estb/14 dated 22.08.2014 filed representations before the Registrar of the University but no response has been given.

7. Respondents have filed counter affidavit. A supplementary counter affidavit filed on behalf of the Registrar of the University is also on record in which it is, inter alia, stated that vide letter dated 23.06.2014 and 18.09.2014 (Annexure-E series to the supplementary counter affidavit) it is brought on record that the Department of Education, Government of Bihar clarified that the pay scale and grade of Assistant will be given to those Store Keepers who have requisite qualification for the said post. The requisite qualification for the post of Assistant is Graduation but the petitioner is matriculate and thus he is not at all entitled to pay scale of Rs.5500-9000 as per the guidelines of the State Government.

8. In the facts and circumstances of the case and the letters of the State Government, as aforesaid, as the petitioner does not possess the requisite qualification for the said post as per the guideline of the State Government, this w

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top