SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Pat) 369

JITENDRA KUMAR
Niranjan Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : M/s Sanjeev Ranjan, Astha Ananya.
For the State : Mr. Zeyaul Hoda, APP.

Jitendra Kumar, J. – Present Cr. Appeal SJ No. 1446 of 2022 has been preferred against the impugned judgment and order dated 28.02.2022 and 05.03.2022 passed by Addl. Sessions Judge-1, Munger, in Sessions Trial No. 31 of 2004 whereby the Appellant was found guilty of offence punishable under section 307 and 323 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act and he was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for ten years with fine of Rs. 2,000/- and in case of default to pay the fine, additional simple imprisonment for 3 months for the offence under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code and simple imprisonment of one year under Section 323 of the Indian Penal Code and fine of Rs. 1,000/- and in case of default to pay the fine, additional simple imprisonment for one month.

2. The prosecution story, as emerging from the Fardbeyan of informant, in brief, is that on 09.05.1997 at 7:00 A.M. while the informant’s aunt Janki Devi was returning from her agricultural field after spraying ash on crops and when she reached near the house of Ambika Yadav, he raised the slogan of Jai Bajrangwali to which she protested and a quarrel took place in between them and the accused persons ca

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top