Back
PURNENDU SINGH
Balaji Enterprises – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
Purnendu Singh, J. – Heard Mr. Suraj Samdarshi alongside Jai Vardhan Narayan, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Mr. Gyan Prakash Ojha, learned GA-7 appearing on behalf of the State and Mr. Naresh Dixit, learned Spl. P.P appearing on behalf of Mines Department.
2. The petitioner has prayed for following relief(s) in paragraph no. 1 of the writ petition: –
“I. Issuance of directions, orders or writs in the nature of certirorari setting aside the order dated 14.07.2023 passed by the Mines Commissioner, Department of Mines and Geology, Bihar in Appeal No. 01/2023 whereby and whereunder the Appeal filed by the petitioner agianst the order dated 23.01.2023 passed by the Collector, Sheikhpura was rejected and the order passed by the Collecotr, Sheikhpura was upheld cancelling the princpal approval vis-a-vis Letter of Intent (LOI) for stone Block No. 27 situated at Mauza Hazaratpur Mandro Chandi, Thana Sheikhpura, District-Sheikhpura in an utmost arbitrary manner against the spirit of Rule 28 of the Bihar Minerals (Concession, Prevention of Illegal Mining, Transportation & Sotrage) Rules, 2019 without appreciating the fact that the petitioner had taken all necessary ste
Illegal Sand Mining – Unless detailed DSRs are prepared by Sub-Divisional Committees by undertaking site visits and using modern technology and unless same are examined by SEAC and SEIAA, it will not....
Point of Law : Principles of natural justice which is the “useless formality” theory is squarely applicable in as much as, on the admitted or indisputable facts the authorities could have come only t....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
