K. VINOD CHANDRAN, PARTHA SARTHY
Gopal Bihari – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
K. Vinod Chandran, CJ.—A batch of four writ petitions were taken up peremptorily for hearing on 10.07.2024, only since the main examinations for selection to the post of District Judge (Entry Level) is scheduled on 14.07.2024. C.W.J.C. No. 10397 of 2024 which too raised identical issues was heard on 11.07.2024 and reserved for judgment. The matters are disposed off by this common judgment.
2. C.W.J.C. No.9746 of 2024 is filed by six candidates who have objected to question No.9 and the answers to questions Nos.48, 58 and 94. The learned Counsel for the petitioner also contended that with respect to the second petitioner, as per the OMR mark-sheet obtained yesterday which has been uploaded by the Registry of the High Court, her total marks would go above that which was prescribed as the cut-off mark in her category. In C.W.J.C. No.9829 of 2024, in addition to the objections raised on the question & answers as hereinabove noted, the learned Counsel also argued on the basis of the tabular column extracted in the writ petition; that even persons who obtained as less marks as 14 and 18 are qualified in the preliminary test and called for the final examination. Specific reference is made
N.T Devin Katti vs. Karnataka Public Service Commission
Ran Vijay vs. State of Uttar Pradesh
Anoop Barnwal vs. Union of India (Election Commission Appointments)
Maharashtra State Board of Secondary & Higher Secondary Education vs. Paritosh Bhupeshkumar Sheth
Vikesh Kumar Gupta vs. State of Rajasthan
High Court of Tripura vs. Tirtha Sarathi Mukherjee
Anoop Barnwal vs. Union of India (Election Commission Appointments)
Maharashtra State Board of Secondary & Higher Secondary Education vs. Paritosh Bhupeshkumar Sheth
Public Service Commission - Civil service Examination - Public Service Commission have no power to relax the recruitment norms - Public Service Commission have no power to relax the recruitment norms
Merit-based selection requires inclusion of qualified candidates from reserved categories in the unreserved list at the preliminary examination stage, ensuring compliance with equality and fairness p....
Merit must govern the selection of candidates across categories, allowing migration from reserved to open categories based on superior performance.
(1) Appointment on post of District Judge (Entry Level) – Executive instructions cannot override statutory Rules where method of final selection by combining cumulative grade value obtained in writte....
Qualifying marks in recruitment are class-specific, allowing candidates to progress in selection regardless of their category, as per Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution.
The court affirmed the authority of recruitment committees to establish cut-off marks post-examination, provided it serves the objective of selecting qualified candidates.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.