Back
G. NARENDAR, NYAPATHY VIJAY
Pilla Suneetha – Appellant
Versus
Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission – Respondent
JUDGMENT: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice G.Narendar)
Heard Sri J.Sudheer, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Sri S.Srinivasa Rao, learned counsel for the appellant; and Sri Nemali Pramod, learned Standing Counsel for the A.P.P.S.C., appearing for the 1st respondent; and learned Government Pleader for G.A.D., appearing for the 2nd respondent.
2. The contesting respondent is the Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission being the selecting authority and the 2nd respondent-State is the appointing authority. The appellant is the petitioner and she is before this Court in this intra-Court Appeal being aggrieved by the order passed by the learned Single Judge, whereby the learned Single Judge was pleased to dismiss the Writ Petition.
3. The parties are referred to by their nomenclature before the learned Single Judge for the sake of convenience and brevity.
4. The brief and admitted facts that are necessary for the disposal of the Writ Appeal are as under:
5. The 1st respondent issued notification inviting applications for the post of Assistant Commissioner of Endowments in the Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Service. The notification bearing No.15/2018
Qualifying marks in recruitment are class-specific, allowing candidates to progress in selection regardless of their category, as per Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution.
The court established that adherence to selection procedures is crucial, but minor deviations do not invalidate the process if they do not affect the outcome.
An administrative decision does not always require a statutory sanction. For instance, it is well settled that for holding interviews for selection/admissions shortlisting can be done, and it is not ....
The court upheld the validity of minimum qualifying marks for recruitment as a discretionary power of the Commission, emphasizing administrative fairness and the principle that participation in the p....
Public Service Commission - Civil service Examination - Public Service Commission have no power to relax the recruitment norms - Public Service Commission have no power to relax the recruitment norms
The court clarified that subject-wise qualifying marks cannot be enforced post-examination as it contradicts the established selection rules, emphasizing the necessity for procedural clarity and comp....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
