IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
P. B. BAJANTHRI and ALOK KUMAR PANDEY, JJ.
Cr.WJC No.650 of 2024
(14.8.2024)
Deepak Dhanuk ... Petitioner
vs.
Union of India & Ors. ... Respondents
Narcotic and Psychotropic Substances Act (PITNDPS), 1988 – Section 3(1) and Constitution of India – Article 22(5) – Order to detention assailed by the petitioner – When a person is said to be detained under the provisions of the PITNDPS, principle of fairness is warranted for the reasons that action of the respondents by various proceedings, petitioner's liberty would be curtailed – therefore, petitioner should have knowledge of the proceedings in the known language – the petitioner, being not in a position to understand the documents in English, it should have been translated in hindi – Section 9(c) of the PITNDPS not complied by the Advisory Board – there is not even reference and consideration of petitioner's wife representation and its rejection by the Government – it is not reasoned and merely states, "after considering the reference and materials placed before the board and upon hearing the detenue in person, the board is of the opinion that there is sufficient ground for detention of the detenue Deepak Dhanuk, son of Kishun Dhanuk, resident of village-Ward No. 10, Shahpur, PO+PS-Shahpur, District-Bhojpur (Ara), Bihar" – an Advisory Board set up under a preventive detention legislation is required to undertake a proper and through scrutiny of an order of detention placed before it, by appreciating all aspects and angles before expressing any definite opinion in its report – in such circumstances, rejection of petitioner's wife's representation and opinion of the Advisory Board dated 22.13.2023 and unreasoned – consequential proceedings of the Central Govt. is arbitrary – order of detention quashed and set aside – petitioner ordered to be released forthwith. (Paras 20, 22, 30, 32, 35 to 37)
A. Ahmad Kutty Vs. Union of India, (1990) 2 SCC 1; P.U. Abdul Rahiman Vs. Union of India, 1991 Supp. (2) SCC 274; Kamarunissa Vs. Union of India, (1991) SCC 128 (Para-13), Veeramani Vs. State of T.N., (1994) 2 SCC 337 – Distinguished.
Sushanta Kumar Banik Vs. State of Tripura, 2022 SCC Online SC 1333; Bhawarlal Ganeshmalji Vs. State of Tamil Nadu, (1979) 1 SCC 465; Sharafat Sheikh Vs. Union of India, 2022 SCC OnLine Del 2725; Jasvinder Kaur Vs. Union of India through its Secretary Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue, 2022 SCC OnLine Del. 510; Smt. Icchu Devi Choraria Vs. Union of India, (1980) 4 SCC 531; Kamla Kanyalal Khushalani Vs. State of Maharashtra, (1981) 1 SCC 748; Nenavath Bujji Etc. Vs. State of Telangana, AIR 2024 SC 1610; Pramod Singla Vs. Union of India disposed of on 10.4.2023 {2023 SCC OnLine SC 374}; ORYX Fisheries Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India, (2010) 13 SCC 427 – Relied.
Union of India Vs. Meera Mohideen, (1995) 4 SCC 51; Taimoor Khan @ Bhola @ Tamoor Vs. Union of India, (2024) SCC Online Del. 416 – Referred.
P. B. Bajanthri, J.—Petitioner has prayed for quashing of the order dated 01.09.2023 passed by the Joint Secretary, Government of India, under Section 3(1) of the Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1988 (for short ‘PITNDPS’) (Annexure-1) and order dated 01.01.2024 passed by the Deputy Secretary, Government of India, under Section 9(f) of the PITNDPS (Annexure-3), confirming the detention order for a period of one year.
Factual Matrix:
2. Brief facts of the case are that petitioner- Deepak Dhanuk was alleged to have involved in Crime No.29/2021, NCB Patna; NDPS Special Case No.26/2021 in connection with seizure of 315 grams of Alprazolam, 270 grams of Morphine and 500 grams of Patthar on 28.11.2021. Similarly in Crime No.04/2022, NCB Patna; NDPS Special Case No.71/2022, seizure of 380 grams of heroin on 26.01.2022. His alleged involvement was based on statement of the accused Madan Singh Sondhiya and Vikas Kumar. Further, a case was registered bearing Shahpur P.S. Case No.448 of 2023 for the alleged offences under Sections 341, 323, 325, 307, 504 and read with 34 of Indian Penal Code. Petitioner-Deepak Dhanuk had the benefit of regular bail in NDPS Special Case No.71/2022 arising out of NCB Case No.04/22 in Criminal Misc. No.37896 of 2023 decided on 04.07.2023 (Annexure-6), in NDPS Case No.57/2022, arising out of NCB Case No.29/2021 dated 26.05.2022, in Criminal Misc. No.40976 of 2023, he had the benefit of regular bail on 19.07.2023 (Annexure-5). Similarly, in respect of Shahpur P.S. Case No.448 of 2023 for the offences under Sections 341, 323, 325, 307, 504 and read with 34 of Indian Penal Code, he had the benefit of regular bail in Criminal Misc. No.5567 of 2024 decided on 09.02.2024.
3. In this backdrop, the Joint Secretary, Government of India, initiated action under Section 3(1) of PITNDPS and it was supported by the grounds on which the detention order dated 01.09.2023 has been issued against the petititoner-Deepak Dhanuk and the same was communicated to him vide Annexures-1 and 2 respectively. On 28.09.2023, in Shahpur P.S. Case No.448 of 2023, petitioner was taken into custody. On 09.02.2024, bail was granted. In the meanwhile, on 17.10.2023, detention order and grounds were served on him. On 03.11.2023, matter was referred to Advisory Board and it was communicated to the petitioner on 11.11.2023 and to Advisory Board on 09.11.2023. Thereafter, petitioner’s wife submitted representation through Registered post to the Joint Secretary, Government of India, on 30.11.2023. The same was rejected on 20.12.2023. Notice was issued for appearance of petitioner before Advisory Board on 20.12.2023 to appear on 21.12.2023 at 03:00 PM. It was deferred to next date i.e., 22.12.2023 and opinion was notified on 22.12.2023. Resultantly, the Deputy Secretary to the Government of India, confirmed the detention order on 01.01.2024 under Section 9(f) of PITNDPS. Hence, the present writ petition.
Arguments advanced by Petitioner:
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that petitioner-Deepak Dhanuk was taken into custody in NCB Case No.29 of 2021 on 26.01.2022. On 18.10.2022, petitioner was remanded in NCB Case No.04 of 2022. He had the benefit of regular bail in NCB Case No.04 of 2022 on 04.07.2023 and, similarly, in NCB Case No.29 of 2021 on 19.07.2023. He was involved in Shahpur P.S. Case No.448 of 2023 and he was under custody till 09.02.2024. In the intervening period on 01.09.2023, the Joint Secretary, Government of India, gave a proposal along with the grounds for detention. Petitioner was served with proposed detention order along with the grounds of detention on 17.10.2023. Petitioner had passed 8th standard and he was not aware of English language. Therefore, the authorities should have furnished proposed detention order with the grounds of detention dated 01.09.2023 along with relied documents in Hindi translation and merely apprising orally is incorrect when liberty of the petitio
A. Ahmad Kutty vs. Union of India
Kamarunissa vs. Union of India, (1991) SCC 128 (Para-13), Veeramani vs. State of T.N.
Bhawarlal Ganeshmalji vs. State of Tamil Nadu
Smt. Icchu Devi Choraria vs. Union of India
Kamla Kanyalal Khushalani vs. State of Maharashtra
Nenavath Bujji Etc. vs. State of Telangana
Preventive detention – When a person is to be detained under provisions of PITNDPS, principle of fairness is warranted – Petitioner should have knowledge of proceedings in known language.
(1) Preventive detention – Principle of Parity is squarely applicable in a case where another co-detenu with identical circumstances, has already been granted relief of quashing detention order again....
Detention orders under the PITNDPS Act can be upheld when communicated timely and justified despite delays in arrest, emphasizing the subjective satisfaction of authorities against habitual offenders....
Preventive detention requires clear grounds and sufficient material to justify the detention, ensuring the detainee's right to make an effective representation is upheld.
Preventive detention requires strict compliance with statutory safeguards and justifications for delay, ensuring protection against arbitrary deprivation of liberty.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.