IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL
Ahanthem Bimol Singh, A. Guneshwar Sharma, JJ.
Md. Jahiya Khan S/o Jakir Khan @ Hussain - Appellant
Vs.
The Union of India represented by the Joint Secretary (PIT-NDPS), Government of India, New Delhi & Ors. - Respondent
W.P.(Crl.) No. 58 of 2023
Decided On : 25-07-2023
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge of detention order under pit-nd&ps act. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments regarding procedural violations in detention. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. state's position on the authorities' role. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. compliance with mandatory provisions of detention procedure. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 5. requirement for confirmation of detention order within three months. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 6. independent consideration of representation by authorities. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 7. procedural lapses leading to invalidation of detention. (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 8. delays in representation disposal affect detention validity. (Para 18) |
| 9. set aside of detention order and conclusion. (Para 19 , 20 , 21) |
JUDGMENT AND ORDER :
A. Guneshwar Sharma, J.
[1] By the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner has challenged the impugned detention order dated 28.12.2022 issued by the Joint Secretary, Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, New Delhi, under Section 3 (1) of the Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act (PIT-ND&PS Act), 1988 whereby detaining the detenu under preventive detention on the ground of non-application of mind and violation of mandatory provisions of the PIT-ND&PS Act. Heard Mr. Th. Jugindro, learned counsel for the petitioner; Mr. S. Samarjeet, learned Sr. PCCG for respondent Nos. 1 & 2; and Mr. Phungyo Zingkhei, learned Dy. Government Advocate for respondent No. 3.
[2] Mr. Th. Jugindro, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the detenu was arrested earlier on 01.07.2017 in connection with FIR No. 214(7) 2017 PRT-PS u/s 21(b) ND&PS Act on allegation of possession of 150 grams of Heroin No. 4 and charge sheet was filed on 22.09.2022 and he is facing trial in connection with Spl. Trial No. 5 of 2022 in the Court of Special Judge, ND&PS, Manipur at Lamphelpat. He was released on bail in this F.I.R. It is also alleged that on 08.12.2021, officers of NCB, Imphal, recovered 10.39 kg of Methamphetamine Crystal from the possession of two persons at Imphal International Airport while going to Chennai and it was alleged that the contrabands were given by the detenu to these two persons. On the basis of the recommendation of the Sponsoring Agency i.e. NCB, Guwahati, the Joint Secretary to the Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue (PITNDPS UNIT) issued detention order dated 28.12.2022 for taking into prevention of the detenu under Section 3 (1) of the Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act (PIT-ND&PS Act), 1988 for preventing from engaging in illicit trafficking of narcotic drugs & psychotropic substances. Since the detenu was on bail and was not residing at his given addresses, the detention order could not be served to him and he was taken into custody only on 06.03.2023 from the Lamphel Court Complex when he came to appear for the trial before the Court. The grounds of detention dated 28.12.2022 was furnished to him on 08.03.2023. Vide letter dated 17.03.2023, the Under Secretary, Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, PIT-NDPS Division, referred the matter to the Advisory Board, Manipur under Section 9 (b) of the PIT-NDPS Act, 1988 and vide opinion dated 25.04.2023 the Board found sufficient reasons for detaining the detenu. The detenu submitted three separate representations all dated 30.03.2023 through the Superintendent, Manipur Central Jail, Sajiwa to (i) the Joint Secretary (PIT NDPS), Government of India; (ii) the Secretary, Government of India, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance; and (iii) the Chairman, PIT NDPS Advisory Board, Manipur. Vide memorandum dated 20.04.2023, the Detaining Authority rejected the representation dated 30.03.2023 submitted by the detenu and again vide memorandum dated 26.05.2023, Secretary (Revenue), Government of India, also rejected the representation dated 30.03.2023 submitted by the detenu. Vide order dated 16.05.2023 issu
Nirmal Kumar Khandelwal v. Union of India
Ankit Ashok Jalan v. Union of India
Rajammal vs. State of Tamil Nadu reported as 1999 (1) SCC 417
The detention order must be based on the detaining authority's subjective satisfaction, and delay in disposal of the representation by the State Government and non-consideration of the representation....
The detention order was unsustainable due to non-application of mind, unexplained delay in disposing of the representation, and failure to furnish necessary documents to the detenu.
The detention order must be supported by sufficient grounds, and the disposals of the representation must be within a reasonable time and in accordance with the law.
Non furnishing of documents is not fatal and also to project that likelihood of release on bail may not be a consideration.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.