KHATIM REZA
Binay Kumar (Male) – Appellant
Versus
Shankar Nath – Respondent
Khatim Reza, J.—Heard Mr. Jitendra Kishore Verma, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. Surendra Kishore Thakur, learned counsel for the respondent.
2. This Second Appeal has been filed by the defendant-appellant-appellant challenging the judgment and decree of affirmance dated 16.09.2022 passed by the learned Additional Judge XVI, Patna in Title Appeal No. 65 of 2015 affirming the judgment and decree dated 26.06.2015 passed by the learned Court of Munsif III, Patna in Title Suit No. 36 of 2011 whereby, the suit was decreed.
3. The matter arises out of Eviction Suit No. 36 of 2011, which was filed by the plaintiff/respondent for eviction of the defendant from the suit premises for bonafide requirement to comply the terms and conditions of the Hire Purchase Agreement between the Plaintiff/Respondent and Bihar State Housing Board (in short ‘Board’) as the Plaintiff/Respondent has constructed three commercial shops unauthorisedly so, the Final Conveyance Deed was not being executed in favour of the Plaintiff by the Bihar State Housing Board due to non demolition of the unauthorized shops by the plaintiffs.
4. The learned Trial Court decreed the suit. The defendant/appellant preferred
M/s. Variety Emporium vs. V.R.M. Mohd. Ibrahim Naina
Ram Naresh Pandey vs. Sita Ram Yadav
The landlord's assessment of personal necessity is paramount, and courts should not interfere unless findings are perverse or unsupported.
A landlord seeking eviction for demolition and reconstruction under the Maharashtra Rent Control Act must comply with specific statutory requirements, including providing equivalent carpet area to th....
The court affirmed that the landlord, as defined under the Jharkhand Building (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, has the authority to initiate eviction proceedings, excluding the application of ....
The court concluded that a landlord does not need formal attornment to establish a tenant's obligation after property transfer, emphasizing the need must be bona fide.
Omission to label a notice with provision under which it is issued would not make it nugatory, if substance thereof is clearly conveyed.
Point of law: “Any aggrieved party” the expression employed in Section 20(1), means a person feeling aggrieved by the ultimate decision, that is, the operative part of the order. A party to the proce....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.