Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
Nilu Devi W/o Late Baban Singh – Appellant
Versus
Gopal Krishna Verma S/o Late Lata Awadhesh Kumar Verma – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI, J.
1. Heard Mr. Mahesh Tewari along with Mr. Abhishek Kumar Dubey, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Mr. Anup Kumar Sinha along with Mr. Karan Shahdeo, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 1 and Mr. Sachin Kumar along with Ms Surabhi, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 2-Jharkhand State Housing Board.
2. Mr. Sachin Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the respondent-Jharkhand State Housing Board submits that by order dated 29.11.2023, the Jharkhand State Housing Board was directed to be made as a party respondent No. 2 in the present case, pursuant to that the counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the respondent No. 2-Jharkhand State Housing Board. He submits that the Jharkhand State Housing Board was not a party before the learned court, who has passed two orders, which are under challenge.
3. This petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the legality and validity of the orders dated 08.08.2023 and 18.07.2023, passed by the learned Sub-Divisional Officer-cum-Rent Controller, Seraikella under the Jharkhand Building (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 2011, in con
The court affirmed that the landlord, as defined under the Jharkhand Building (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, has the authority to initiate eviction proceedings, excluding the application of ....
The court affirmed that non-payment of rent constitutes a breach of tenancy conditions, justifying eviction under the Jharkhand Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 2011.
The State Government exceeded its jurisdiction under the U.P. Rent Control Act by restoring a sub-letting order that contravenes established tenant rights, emphasizing the requirement that tenants oc....
[The court established that notices issued without proper authority under the Jharkhand State Housing Board Act, 2000, are invalid, and that allottees have a right to equitable treatment in the conte....
A tenant cannot dispute the title of the landlord, and genuine need for premises must be established without alternative accommodation for eviction to be warranted. Adverse possession claims require ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
