SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Pat) 475

P. B. BAJANTHRI, ALOK KUMAR PANDEY
Richa Kumari – Appellant
Versus
Anand Kumar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant : Mr.Ram Sumiran Rai.
For the Respondent: Mr. Anand Kumar (In Person).

Alok Kumar Pandey, J.—The present appeal is directed against the ex parte judgment dated 24.05.2022 and decree dated 06.06.2022 passed in Matrimonial (Divorce) Case No. 264/2017 by the Court of learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Vaishali at Hajipur, whereby and whereunder the learned trial court has allowed the divorce petition filed by the respondent on the ground of desertion, cruelty and adultery.

2. Briefly stated facts of the case is that marriage of appellant and respondent took place on 03.03.2011 and after marriage both started leading conjugal life. It is asserted that appellant/wife started residing separately since June, 2011. It is further alleged that appellant filed Mahnar P.S. Case No. 129 of 2012 under Sections 498A, 406 of the IPC. It is further averred that since the year 2011, no conjugal relation has been stated to be established between the appellant/wife and respondent/husband. It has been claimed by the respondent that earlier Divorce Case No. 221 of 2013 has been withdrawn which was filed on account of non-cooperative attitude of the appellant for leading conjugal life. The appellant filed several cases against the family members of the respondent on the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top