PATNA HIGH COURT
P.B. Bajanthri and Alok Kumar Pandey, JJ.
Richa Kumari – Appellant
versus
Anand Kumar – Respondent
Miscellaneous Appeal No.656 of 2022
Decided on 2.8.2024
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 – Section 13 – Civil Procedure Code, 1908 – Order 5 Rules 12, 15 and 17 – Ex-parte decree of divorce – Desertion, cruelty and adultery by wife – Ex-parte judgment is legally unsustainable on the ground of non-service of notice upon appellant and same needs to be remanded for retrial – Substituted service has to be resorted as last resort when defendant cannot be served in ordinary way – Court has not given any reason as to why court has chosen for substituted service – Case was fixed for ex-parte hearing against appellant – On date in question Covid-19 was in its peak – Order sheets of different dates of Family Court regarding service of speed post notice indicate that how casually and in a routine manner order has been passed and there is no whisper on any specific date that court has satisfied with service of notice served upon appellant – Appellant was not duly served with notice and procedure adopted for directing substituted service being vitiated, ex-parte judgment passed against appellant set aside – Matter remitted back to Family Court for decision afresh in accordance with law.(Paras 4, 6, 7 and 8)
Result: Appeal allowed.
JUDGMENT (CAV)
Alok Kumar Pandey, J.—The present appeal is directed against the ex parte judgment dated 24.05.2022 and decree dated 06.06.2022 passed in Matrimonial (Divorce) Case No. 264/2017 by the Court of learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Vaishali at Hajipur, whereby and whereunder the learned trial court has allowed the divorce petition filed by the respondent on the ground of desertion, cruelty and adultery.
2. Briefly stated facts of the case is that marriage of appellant and respondent took place on 03.03.2011 and after marriage both started leading conjugal life. It is asserted that appellant/wife started residing separately since June, 2011. It is further alleged that appellant filed Mahnar P.S. Case No. 129 of 2012 under Sections 498A, 406 of the IPC. It is further averred that since the year 2011, no conjugal relation has been stated to be established between the appellant/wife and respondent/husband. It has been claimed by the respondent that earlier Divorce Case No. 221 of 2013 has been withdrawn which was filed on account of non-cooperative attitude of the appellant for leading conjugal life. The appellant filed several cases against the family members of the respondent on the basis of wrong and fabricated facts. The appellant was mentally ill and she has been treated at Ranchi and because of mental illness, she became aggressive and the respondent has levelled the allegation of cruelty, desertion and adultery against the appellant. It is further alleged that appellant did not appear even after service of notice.
3. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that impugned judgment and decree has been passed in Matrimonial (Divorce) Case No. 264 of 2017 in most casual and perfunctory manner against the weightage of evidence and thus is unsustainable and the same is without having spirit of law. Learned counsel further submitted that respondent has falsely alleged several allegation against the appellant and thereafter learned Family Court issued notice to the appellant but respondent has mentioned wrong address in the envelope as Anant Kumar Singh, resident of village-Behab Deorhi, P.S. Supaul, District-Purnea in place of Bhabua Deorhi, P.S. Rupauli, District-Purnea and accordingly, notice was not served upon the appellant because address of the appellant has wrongly been mentioned by the respondent-husband with malice intention. Learned counsel further submitted that Family Court without giving opportunity of hearing, the appellant proceeded to initiate ex parte proceeding. Learned counsel further submitted that impugned judgment reveals that during course of ex parte hearing, three witnesses have been examined on behalf of the respondent/husband. They are PW-1/respondent-husband himself, PW-2/Abhishek Kumar and PW-3/Anil Kumar Singh (father of the respondent). Learned counsel further submitted that impugned judgment has been passed on the ground of desertion, cruelty and adultery but the said ingredients have not been supported by the deposition of witnesses and without giving proper opportunity for contesting the case, matrimonial dispute should not be adjudicated and no witness has been produced on behalf of the appellant. There is nothing on record to prove the ground of cruelty, desertion and adultery.
4. From perusal of the record, we are satisfied that ex parte judgment is legally unsustainable on the ground of non-service of notice upon the appellant-Richa Kumari and the same needs to be remanded for retrial, we are not inclined to go into the details of merit of the present appeal, as any observation on that count might affect the case of either of the parties when matter is retried by the trial court on merit.
5. On 11.12.2017 order was passed to issue notice by speed post. Order sheet dated 28.03.2018 indicates that notice has already been issued and order sheet dated 28.05.2018 indicates that case was posted for submitting the compliance report on 16.07.2018. Previous order sheet dated 28.05.201
Ex-parte decree of divorce – Substituted service has to be resorted as last resort when defendant cannot be served in ordinary way – Ex-parte judgment passed against appellant set aside.
The court emphasized the necessity of proper service of summons in divorce proceedings, ruling that failure to comply with procedural requirements invalidates ex parte judgments.
Annulment of marriage by ex-parte decree – Service of summons to a wife in a matrimonial dispute concerning divorce is a serious matter and service cannot be presumed.
Setting aside ex-parte decree of divorce – For a defendant to succeed in application for setting aside ex-parte decree, he has to satisfy court that summons was not duly served or that he was prevent....
The court recognized willful neglect as a valid ground for divorce under Hindu law, establishing that non-contestation and prolonged separation indicate desertion.
Ex-parte proceedings – Personal service of summons/notice in ordinary way is a rule and substituted service is an exception – Before passing any order for substituted service on the basis of material....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.