RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD, SHAILENDRA SINGH
Ranjeet Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
Shailendra Singh, J.—Heard Mr. Baxi S.R.P. Sinha, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. Lokesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the appellant, Mr. Harsh Singh, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 2 to 4 and Mr. Bipin Kumar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The instant appeal has been preferred against the judgment dated 18.11.2022 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Gopalganj in Sessions Trial No. 765 of 2016, arising out of Uchkagaon P.S. Case No. 97 of 2011 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 379 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code (in short ‘IPC’) read with Section 34 of IPC whereby the respondent nos. 2 to 4 (hereinafter referred as ‘respondents’) have been acquitted of the charged offences.
Prosecution Story:
3. The substance of the prosecution story is as follows:—
As per prosecution, on 21.05.2011, at about 5:00 P.M., the informant (deceased) was going to his clinic by riding on a motorcycle which was being driven by him. When he reached at Jhirua-Arna Road near a mosque, the accused/respondents namely, Arvind Yadav, Rajeev Yadav and Binod Yadav along with their 50 supporters were coming in a procession from the side of
Sheikh Meheboob vs. State of Maharashtra
State Inspector of Police, Vishakhapatnam vs. Surya Sankaram Karri
The evidentiary value of hostile witnesses can support the prosecution case if found credible, notwithstanding the non-recovery of weapons or procedural lapses.
Interested evidence is not necessarily unreliable and should be scrutinized with care but cannot be rejected merely on the ground of being partisan. Minor discrepancies and contradictions should not ....
Point of Law : The appellant shall be released from jail forthwith, unless wanted in any other case, subject to compliance of the provisions of Section 437A Cr.P.C. to the satisfaction of the trial c....
Discrepancies in eyewitness accounts undermined the prosecution's case, leading to the acquittal of the accused due to reasonable doubt of their involvement in the crime.
Conviction under IPC 302/34 upheld on reliable sole eyewitness testimony corroborated by medical evidence and witnesses, despite minor discrepancies and non-examination of investigating officer/docto....
Point of law: Every person who witnesses a murder reacts in his own way. Some are stunned, become speechless and stand rooted to the spot. Some become hysteric and start wailing. Some start shouting ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.